Practice Studio/Civil services & state PSC mains
Free answer writing Handwritten paperMP State Service

MPPSC Mains — Answer Writing

MPPSC sets a very large number of short answers rather than a few long ones, so the mains is a test of speed and compression as much as of knowledge — and the fourth GS paper on philosophy, psychology and sociology rewards conceptual precision instead of coverage.

MADHYA PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
STATE SERVICE (MAIN) EXAMINATION
GENERAL STUDIES — PAPER II
Time Allowed: Three HoursMaximum Marks: 300

All questions are compulsory. Answers are to be written in the medium opted for. Word limits are strictly enforced.

  1. 1.Assess the implementation of the Forest Rights Act, 2006 in Madhya Pradesh, with reference to individual and community claims.8120 words
  2. 2.Describe the constitutional provisions relating to the Scheduled Areas and their application in Madhya Pradesh.680 words
  3. 3.Explain the objectives and outcomes of the state's tribal welfare programmes.10150 words
Papers
6
Written
By hand
Marked on
Criteria
Report back in
~20 seconds
See it marked

One MPPSC Mains answer, from question to marked report

A real question, an attempt with the weaknesses a real attempt has, and the report an AI examiner hands back — in the marking unit MPPSC Mains genuinely uses. This is the whole product; there is nothing else to sign up for.

1
You get a question

Scoped to the paper and topic you pick, at the marks it is genuinely set at.

Studio 07:30
General Studies II8 marks

Assess the implementation of the Forest Rights Act, 2006 in Madhya Pradesh, with reference to individual and community claims.

2
You write it

Type it, dictate it, or write on paper and photograph the page — your handwriting is read.

Writing room 04:12
Type Speak Paper
MP has the largest tribal population in India. Under FRA many claims were filed. A large number of individual claims were rejected. Community forest rights are recognised less. The state should improve the process at gram sabha level. The Act recognises the rights of forest dwelling scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers who have been living on forest land for generations. Lakhs of claims were filed in the state after 2008 and titles have been distributed in large numbers, most of them to individual claimants. Many claims were rejected because the claimant could not produce the evidence that the committee asked for, and in several districts the committees at the village level did not meet regularly. Awareness among claimants is low, the forms are in difficult language and the forest staff are not always helpful. Training of committee members and regular camps in the villages would improve the position.
150 / 150 words
You haven't signalled a conclusion yet — an examiner looks for one.
3
Your page comes back marked

Photographed, read, and marked in red — every criterion scored down the right margin and the omissions written in.

Your page, photographed and readMarked in red
Q. No. 1General Studies IIMax. marks 8
Q1

MP has the largest tribal population in India. Under FRA many claims were filed. A large number of individual claims were rejected.? Community forest rights are recognised less. The state should improve the process at gram sabha level. The Act recognises the rights of forest dwelling scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers who have been living on forest land for generations. Lakhs of claims were filed in the state after 2008 and titles have been distributed in large numbers, most of them to individual claimants. Many claims were rejected because the claimant could not produce the evidence that the committee asked for, and in several districts the committees at the village level did not meet regularly. Awareness among claimants is low, the forms are in difficult language and the forest staff are not always helpful. Training of committee members and regular camps in the villages would improve the position.

The distinction between IFR titles and CFR, which secures management rights over the resourceRejection without reasons recorded, and the review process
4/8
Page 1Marks for each expected point are written down the right margin
The pen marks on your page
VagueSay why — evidence requirements, absence of gram sabha verification, and rejections without reasons recorded.
StrongCorrect, and it is the point the question turns on. Now explain the consequence for forest governance.
What the examiner wanted and did not find
  • The distinction between IFR titles and CFR, which secures management rights over the resource
  • Rejection without reasons recorded, and the review process
  • Convergence with the Van Dhan and MFP minimum support price schemes
Model answer for this question

Distinguish IFR (individual occupation) from CFR (community management of the resource). Assess: high claim volume, high rejection rate, and disproportionately low CFR recognition. Causes: evidentiary burden on claimants, weak gram sabha capacity, departmental resistance, rejections without recorded reasons. Fix: review of rejections, CFR facilitation cells, convergence with MFP procurement.

Write on real paper

Photograph the page from your phone and the Studio reads your handwriting — the only way to practise the speed and layout the paper actually tests.

Marked in about twenty seconds

Fast enough to write, read the report and rewrite the same answer in one sitting — which is where the improvement actually comes from.

Write this one yourself
4
And you see where each mark went

The scoring behind those pen marks: every criterion, what it was worth, what you earned, and a model answer.

Evaluation reportIllustrative
Examiner criteria
Claim types distinguished — IFR and CFR1/2

Both mentioned; the difference in what each secures is not.

State-specific assessment1/3

Tribal population noted. District examples and the scale of claims would carry the assessment.

Causes of the implementation gap1/2

Gram sabha weakness named; the evidentiary burden and forest department resistance are not.

Compression — short answer, no padding1/1

Appropriately short for the marks.

Total 4/8AverageAI estimate — not an official score

MPPSC Mains at a glance

Conducting bodyMadhya Pradesh Public Service Commission
ModeHandwritten in an answer booklet
Papers6
MarkingMPPSC Mains — examiner criteria
Marked the way MPPSC Mains answers are marked — examiner criteria, against this exam's own conventions rather than a generic essay rubric.
Confirm the marks and paper list against the current MPPSC notification.

What MPPSC Mains sets

The papers you sit, and what each is worth.

1General Studies I300 marks 180 min
2General Studies II300 marks 180 min
3General Studies III300 marks 180 min
4General Studies IV200 marks 180 min

Philosophy, psychology, sociology and ethics.

5General Hindi and grammar200 marks 180 min
6Hindi essay writing100 marks 120 min
Practice StudioWrite or type
FreeWrite as many answers as you want — nothing is paywalled.
Start writing
  • Marked to the MPPSC Mains scheme
  • Model answer, every time
  • Handwriting read from a photo
  • AI viva on any topic
  • Full timed papers
  • Every attempt kept in your archive
Marked in about twenty seconds
Three rooms, one studio
  • WriteA question, answered and marked.
  • VivaQuestioned on Tribal welfare in MP and more.
  • Full paperA timed paper, one scorecard.
FreeMarked in ~20s
Start writing
Header Logo