Advanced Supply, Place of Supply and Time and Value of Supply — Practice

Question 1

A retailer sells a laptop bag, a wireless mouse and a box of chocolates together for one combined price, only because this specific customer requested the three items be billed together; the retailer does not ordinarily sell these three items as a bundle. Classify this supply and explain why.

Accepted Answer

This is a mixed supply, not a composite supply, because the test for a composite supply is whether the bundled items are naturally, ordinarily supplied together in the normal course of business, not merely whether they happen to be billed together on one invoice at the customer's own request. A laptop bag, a wireless mouse and a box of chocolates have no natural, ordinary trade connection to each other, and the retailer does not ordinarily sell them as a combined package; the bundling here reflects only this specific transaction's own convenience, at this specific customer's own request, rather than the trade's own ordinary practice. Being a mixed supply, this bundle is taxed at the rate applicable to whichever of the three items carries the highest rate of tax among them, rather than at a single principal supply's own rate the way a genuine composite supply would be.

Question 2

A company's Karnataka branch transfers finished goods, on which input tax credit was availed, to the company's own Maharashtra branch for onward sale, with no invoice raised in the ordinary commercial sense and no consideration actually paid by the Maharashtra branch. Explain whether this transfer attracts GST liability, and how it should be valued.

Accepted Answer

This transfer attracts GST liability despite no consideration actually changing hands, because the Karnataka branch and the Maharashtra branch, though part of the same legal entity, are treated as distinct persons under GST specifically because they are registered (or required to be registered) in different states, and Schedule I deems a supply of goods between distinct persons in the course or furtherance of business to be a supply even without consideration. Since no actual transaction price exists between the two branches to value this deemed supply by, valuation must proceed under the specific valuation rules rather than under the ordinary transaction-value rule, generally by reference to the open market value of goods of like kind and quality, or, where that cannot be determined, a value computed under the prescribed alternative method in the hierarchy the rules specify, rather than the Karnataka branch simply choosing whichever value it considers convenient.

Question 3

An Indian branch of a multinational company provides a specific service to its own foreign head office, is paid in convertible foreign exchange, and the place of supply (applying the applicable rules) is outside India. The branch claims this is a zero-rated export of service. Evaluate this claim.

Accepted Answer

This claim is incorrect. A supply of service qualifies as an export only where several conditions are jointly satisfied, including that the supplier and the recipient are not merely establishments of the same distinct legal person; an Indian branch and its own foreign head office are, in substance, the same legal person operating through two different establishments, not two genuinely separate parties to an arm's-length transaction. Even though the payment-in-foreign-exchange condition and the place-of-supply-outside-India condition might both be satisfied here, this same-legal-person condition is not, and export-of-service status is accordingly denied; the transaction instead falls to be examined under the specific provisions addressing supply between distinct establishments of the same person, rather than being zero-rated as a genuine export.

Question 4

An Indian company sends specialised machinery to a service provider's workshop abroad for a specific repair service requiring the machinery's physical presence at that workshop. Explain why the general recipient-location place-of-supply rule for cross-border services does not apply here, and what rule applies instead.

Accepted Answer

The general rule for a cross-border supply of services places the supply at the recipient's own location, but this rule is displaced for services that are inherently performance-based and require a good to be made physically available to the service provider, since a recipient-location rule would produce an arbitrary result entirely disconnected from where the genuine economic activity constituting the service, in this case the actual physical repair work, is performed. Because this repair service requires the machinery's physical presence at the service provider's own workshop, the place of supply is instead the location where the service is actually performed, that is, the location of the workshop abroad, rather than the Indian company's own location as recipient.

Question 5

A retailer issues a gift voucher redeemable specifically against one named product already selected by the purchaser, and separately issues a general-purpose gift card redeemable against any product in the store at the holder's future choice. Explain the time of supply applicable to each.

Accepted Answer

For the voucher redeemable specifically against one named, already-identified product, the supply against that voucher is identifiable at the point the voucher itself is issued, and the time of supply is accordingly the date of issue of the voucher, since this voucher is, in substance, an advance payment for a specific, already-determined future supply. For the general-purpose gift card redeemable against any product the holder later chooses, the specific supply cannot be identified at the point of issue, since the holder has not yet made a choice, and the time of supply is instead the date of redemption of the card, when the holder actually selects and receives a specific product, since only at that point does a specific, identifiable supply actually come into existence for time-of-supply purposes.

Question 6

A supplier grants a post-supply discount to a customer three months after the original invoice, based purely on the supplier's own discretionary goodwill decision, with no prior agreement establishing this discount. Explain whether this discount can be excluded from the value of supply, and what the position would be if the same discount had instead been provided for in the original sale agreement, linked to specific invoices.

Accepted Answer

This discretionary, post-supply discount cannot be excluded from the value of supply, because a discount is excludible from value only where it is established in terms of an agreement entered into at or before the time of supply and is specifically linked to relevant invoices; a discount decided upon purely at the supplier's own later discretion, with no prior agreement establishing it, fails this condition, meaning the supplier remains liable to pay tax on the full, pre-discount value despite the commercial discount actually granted to the customer. Had the same discount instead been provided for in the original sale agreement itself, linked to specific invoices, and had the recipient reversed input tax credit attributable to the discount (since this post-supply discount condition additionally requires this reversal), the discount would satisfy both required conditions and could then be validly excluded from the value of supply, illustrating how the same commercial discount can receive entirely different GST treatment purely depending on when and how it was documented and agreed.

Question 7

A manufacturer sends raw material to a job worker for a specific processing operation, and the job worker returns the processed goods to the manufacturer within the prescribed period, with no GST charged on either movement. Explain the classification underlying this treatment.

Accepted Answer

The job work activity itself, the specific processing operation the job worker performs on the manufacturer's own goods, is classified as a supply of service by the job worker, not as a supply of goods, since ownership of the goods never actually transfers to the job worker at any point in this arrangement, the job worker merely performs a processing service on goods that remain the manufacturer's own property throughout. Because the goods sent to, and subsequently received back from, the job worker are not themselves being supplied (no transfer of ownership occurring on either movement), specific provisions permit these movements to occur without GST being charged on the movement itself, provided the goods are returned within the prescribed period; only the job worker's own service charge, if any, for performing the processing operation, and not the value of the goods themselves, is what actually attracts GST as the underlying supply of service.

Question 8

An Indian architectural firm provides design consultancy services connected with a specific building project located abroad, for a client also located abroad. Explain which place-of-supply rule governs this service and why the recipient's own foreign location does not, on its own, resolve the question.

Accepted Answer

Services connected with immovable property are placed at the property's own location, not by reference to the general recipient-location rule, because a service intrinsically tied to a specific, fixed asset (here, the specific building project) should logically be taxed by reference to where that asset actually is, rather than by reference to an unrelated recipient location that may have no genuine connection to where the service's real subject matter, the immovable property itself, is situated. Since the building project here is located abroad, the place of supply is outside India regardless of the recipient's own location also being abroad, meaning in this specific fact pattern both the immovable-property rule and the recipient's own location happen to point the same way, but a candidate should recognise that it is the immovable-property rule, not the recipient's location, that is the operative, governing rule here, since a different fact pattern could easily place the recipient in one location and the immovable property in another, in which case only the immovable-property rule would correctly resolve the place of supply.

Question 9

An employee performs services for their employer in the ordinary course of employment, and separately, the same employer writes off business assets on which credit was availed, disposing of them without consideration to an unrelated party. Explain why the first activity falls outside GST entirely while the second is a taxable deemed supply.

Accepted Answer

Services provided by an employee to an employer in the course of, or in relation to, employment are specifically treated under Schedule III as neither a supply of goods nor a supply of services, placing this activity entirely outside GST's scope, since an employment relationship is not, in substance, a commercial supply transaction between independent parties but a relationship of service under a contract of employment. The permanent disposal of business assets on which input tax credit was availed, by contrast, is specifically deemed to be a supply under Schedule I even without consideration, precisely because credit was availed on those assets, and allowing the assets to leave the business without any GST consequence would let the business retain the benefit of credit on an asset that no longer serves any taxable business purpose; the distinction turns on Schedule III's specific carve-out for employment-relationship activities versus Schedule I's specific inclusion of credit-availed asset disposals, not on any general principle that consideration is always required for a taxable supply to arise.

Question 10

Explain the place-of-supply rule for goods imported into India, and why this rule is comparatively simple relative to the cross-border place-of-supply rules for services.

Accepted Answer

The place of supply for goods imported into India is the location of the importer, a comparatively simple, single rule without the multiple performance-based or property-based exceptions the cross-border services rules carry. This comparative simplicity reflects that goods, being physical, tangible property, have an inherently clear point of entry and a clear, single importer receiving them, leaving little genuine ambiguity about which location the supply should be attributed to; services, being intangible, do not have this same clear physical anchor, which is precisely why the services rules need multiple specific exceptions (performance-based location, immovable property location) to handle situations where a simple recipient-location rule would produce an arbitrary or economically disconnected result. This contrast reinforces why this chapter treats goods and services as needing separately reasoned place-of-supply analysis rather than one uniform rule applied to both.

Question 11

A company enters a twelve-month annual maintenance contract with a client, with the contract specifying that payment is due on a quarterly basis against a statement of the work performed in each quarter. Explain how the time of supply is determined for this arrangement, and why a single time-of-supply determination for the whole twelve-month contract would be inappropriate.

Accepted Answer

This is a continuous supply of services, a single supply provided over an extended period under a contract providing for periodic payment, and the time of supply for such a continuous supply is determined separately for each periodic payment, generally fixed by reference to the due date of payment specified in the contract for that period, or the date the corresponding statement of account is issued, rather than by one single time-of-supply determination applied to the entire twelve-month contract as if it were a single, one-off supply. A single time-of-supply determination for the whole contract would be inappropriate because it would require fixing liability for the entire twelve months' value at one single point in time (most likely the contract's inception), even though the actual service is genuinely rendered progressively over the following twelve months and payment is genuinely due only progressively as well; treating each quarterly period as its own time-of-supply event more accurately tracks the economic reality of when the service is actually rendered and paid for, and is precisely why continuous supplies carry their own specific time-of-supply rule distinct from the general one-off invoice/payment rule.

Question 12

A manufacturer supplies goods to a dealer partly for a cash payment and partly in exchange for the dealer providing a marketing service to the manufacturer, with no separate cash value assigned to the marketing service in the agreement. Explain how the value of the manufacturer's supply of goods should be determined.

Accepted Answer

Since consideration for this supply of goods is not wholly in money, part being the dealer's own marketing service, section 15's general rule (price actually paid, where price is the sole consideration) cannot apply directly, and value must instead be determined under the specific valuation rules addressing non-monetary consideration. The value is generally the open market value of the goods supplied; where the open market value cannot be readily determined, the value is the cash consideration actually paid plus the open market value of the non-monetary consideration (the marketing service) if known, and where neither can be readily determined, value falls to a computed value under the prescribed alternative method in the hierarchy the rules specify. This ensures the full economic value of what the manufacturer actually received, cash plus a genuine marketing service, is captured for GST purposes, rather than allowing tax to be understated purely because part of the consideration took a non-monetary form with no explicit cash value assigned to it in the parties' own agreement.

Question 13

Explain why a works contract, involving both a transfer of goods and the provision of construction-related services, does not require a case-by-case composite-versus-mixed-supply analysis the way an ordinary bundled sale would.

Accepted Answer

An ordinary bundled sale of goods and services requires applying the composite-versus-mixed-supply test on its own specific facts, asking whether the bundled elements are naturally, ordinarily supplied together in the normal course of business. A works contract, however, is specifically and exhaustively defined under GST as a supply of service, by a deeming fiction that removes any need for this case-by-case natural-bundling analysis, since the law itself has already determined, as a matter of statutory classification, that a works contract (involving the transfer of property in goods, whether as goods or in some other form, in the execution of a contract for building, construction, or similar activity on immovable property) is to be treated as a single supply of service, regardless of how the specific transaction's own facts might otherwise be analysed under the general composite-supply test. This deeming fiction exists precisely to avoid the genuine difficulty and inconsistency that could otherwise arise from applying an open-ended, facts-based composite-supply test to the enormous variety of works-contract arrangements actually seen in the construction industry.

Question 14

A supplier charges a customer a separate packing and forwarding charge in addition to the basic price of goods sold. Explain whether this packing and forwarding charge should be included in the value of supply.

Accepted Answer

This packing and forwarding charge should be included in the value of supply, because value of supply specifically includes any incidental expenses charged by the supplier to the recipient at the time of, or before, delivery of the goods, including packing, and any amount charged for anything done by the supplier in respect of the supply at the time of, or before, delivery. Since the packing and forwarding charge is directly connected with, and incidental to, delivering the goods actually supplied, it forms part of the same overall supply's value rather than being treated as a separate, independent supply of a packing service with its own distinct valuation; a supplier cannot reduce the taxable value of the underlying goods supply by artificially separating out and separately invoicing what is, in substance, an incidental cost of making that same supply.

Question 15

A retailer sells a gift hamper containing several unrelated grocery items, none of which are naturally or ordinarily sold together as a bundle, all of which happen to carry the same rate of GST. Explain how this hamper should be classified and whether the mixed-supply rate rule has any practical effect here.

Accepted Answer

This hamper is a mixed supply, since its contents (several unrelated grocery items with no natural, ordinary trade connection to each other) are not naturally or ordinarily supplied together in the normal course of business, the same classification test applied throughout this chapter regardless of whether the bundled items happen to share the same rate. The mixed-supply rule taxing the entire bundle at the highest rate among its constituent supplies has no distinguishing practical effect in this specific scenario, precisely because every constituent item already carries the same rate, meaning the highest rate among the bundle and each item's own individual rate happen to coincide here; the classification as a mixed supply (rather than composite) still matters conceptually and would matter practically the moment even one constituent item in the hamper carried a different rate, at which point the entire hamper's value would be taxed at that higher rate rather than each item being separately valued and taxed at its own individual rate.

Practice — Advanced Supply, Place of Supply and Time and Value of Supply

Sign in to save attempts to your dashboard and track your accuracy over time

Find a verified tutor

Join a live course

Browse coaching centres

About

Categories

Support

Documentation

Get Study Tips & Updates

Download Our App

Download for iOS

Download for Android

Popular Cities