Human Rights & Security Issues — Practice

Question 1

Can the NHRC directly punish an officer found responsible for a human-rights violation?

Accepted Answer

No — the NHRC can inquire, recommend compensation or prosecution, and report, but has no direct power to punish or prosecute.

Question 2

Which Act created the NHRC, and in which year?

Accepted Answer

The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.

Question 3

Is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) legally binding on India?

Accepted Answer

No — the UDHR (1948) is a non-binding declaration. The ICCPR and ICESCR, both ratified by India in 1979, are the binding treaty instruments.

Question 4

What three procedural steps does the NHRC's 2010 guideline require after a security-force encounter death?

Accepted Answer

FIR registration with independent investigation, a magisterial inquiry (preferably within three months), and a report to the NHRC by the district's senior superintendent of police within 48 hours.

Question 5

How does a departmental inquiry differ from a magisterial inquiry into the same encounter death?

Accepted Answer

A departmental inquiry is internal, examining whether personnel followed the force's own procedure. A magisterial inquiry is judicial, examining whether the death was lawful, and can lead to prosecution regardless of the departmental inquiry's own findings.

Question 6

Did the Supreme Court's 1997 Naga People's Movement of Human Rights judgment strike down AFSPA?

Accepted Answer

No — it upheld AFSPA's constitutional validity, but attached firm operating conditions: deployment must remain temporary, 'disturbed area' declarations must be reviewed at least every six months, and only minimum necessary force may be used.

Question 7

Explain why AFSPA's validity and its safeguards are described as 'legally inseparable.'

Accepted Answer

The 1997 judgment's affirmation of AFSPA's constitutional validity was conditioned on specific operating requirements (temporary deployment, periodic six-monthly review of disturbed-area status, minimum necessary force) plus the Act's own statutory requirement to hand an arrested person to the nearest police station without delay — the validity was never granted unconditionally, so removing the conditions would undercut the basis on which validity was upheld.

Question 8

Why should a CAPF candidate's essay on human rights and security differ in framing from a general UPSC CSE candidate's essay on the same theme?

Accepted Answer

A CAPF officer will personally operate inside this exact accountability framework — their own use-of-force decisions and their command responsibility for personnel will be judged against these same NHRC and judicial standards over an actual career, not just studied as external subject knowledge. An essay reflecting that professional stake demonstrates genuine career-readiness in a way a purely academic treatment cannot.

Practice — Human Rights & Security Issues

Sign in to save attempts to your dashboard and track your accuracy over time

Find a verified tutor

Join a live course

Browse coaching centres

About

Categories

Support

Documentation

Get Study Tips & Updates

Download Our App

Download for iOS

Download for Android

Popular Cities