The Accounting Standards Framework and Applicability — Practice

Question 1

Two companies buy identical machines on the same day for the same price. One depreciates over eight years and expenses the installation engineer's travel; the other depreciates over fifteen years and capitalises it. Both are honest. Explain the problem this illustrates and the two devices by which Accounting Standards address it.

Accepted Answer

The problem is not disagreement about arithmetic but the impossibility of comparison. Financial statements are read by people who did not prepare them and cannot inspect the entity — shareholders, lenders, regulators, prospective buyers — and who must rely on the numbers meaning what they appear to mean. If every preparer may choose their own conventions, a reader cannot compare two companies, cannot compare one company across two years, and cannot be confident that the words carry their ordinary meaning. Here two honest companies report materially different profits from identical facts. Standards address this by two devices and only two. First, they restrict choice: where one treatment is right, the standard mandates it. Second, where a genuine choice must remain because circumstances genuinely differ, the standard requires the choice to be disclosed, so that a reader can adjust for it. The cost is accepted openly: a rule general enough to cover a steel plant and a software firm will sometimes fit neither perfectly, and standards trade that imprecision for comparability.

Question 2

A company has signed a board resolution to purchase machinery next quarter, holds a machine under a finance lease, and owns an obsolete machine that can no longer be used or sold. Apply the Framework's definition of an asset to each.

Accepted Answer

The Framework defines an asset as a resource controlled by the enterprise as a result of past events, from which future economic benefits are expected to flow. The board resolution creates no asset: there has been no past event, only an intention, and an intention can be reversed. The leased machine is an asset despite not being owned, because the definition requires control rather than ownership, and under a finance lease the lessee controls the machine and takes substantially all the risks and rewards of its use; this is precisely why a finance lease places the asset on the lessee's balance sheet. The obsolete machine fails the definition on the third limb: no future economic benefits are expected to flow from it, since it can neither be used nor sold, and what was originally paid for it is irrelevant, because the definition is forward-looking. It should be written down, its carrying amount recognised as an expense.

Question 3

State the two-stage test the Framework applies before an item appears in the financial statements, and use it to explain why a contingent liability is disclosed rather than recognised and why an internally generated brand is not recognised at all.

Accepted Answer

Stage one is that the item must meet the definition of an element — asset, liability, equity, income or expense. Stage two is that two further conditions must both hold: it must be probable that any future economic benefit associated with the item will flow to or from the enterprise, and the item must have a cost or value that can be measured reliably. A contingent liability fails at stage two on the probability condition, and in many cases meets the definition of a liability only doubtfully in any event, since the obligation may be possible rather than present. Because the information is still relevant to a reader assessing risk, the response is disclosure rather than recognition. An internally generated brand fails at stage two on the measurement condition: benefits may well flow from it, but its cost cannot be reliably separated from the cost of running the business as a whole, since advertising, service quality and pricing all contribute to it indistinguishably. So it is not recognised, which is why a purchased brand can appear on a balance sheet and a self-built brand of equal value cannot.

Question 4

Name the four principal qualitative characteristics of financial information, list the five components of reliability, and state the two constraints that qualify all four characteristics.

Accepted Answer

The four principal characteristics are understandability, relevance, reliability and comparability. Understandability assumes a user with a reasonable knowledge of business and accounting who is willing to study the information with reasonable diligence, so complex information is not excluded merely because some users find it difficult. Relevance means the information influences economic decisions by helping users evaluate past, present or future events or confirm or correct earlier evaluations, and it is affected by nature and by materiality, materiality being a threshold rather than a characteristic of its own. Reliability has five components: faithful representation; substance over form, so that transactions are accounted for by their commercial reality rather than their legal wrapping; neutrality, meaning freedom from bias; prudence, a degree of caution in exercising judgement under uncertainty; and completeness within the bounds of materiality and cost. Comparability requires consistency of measurement and presentation across periods and entities, together with disclosure of policies used. The two constraints are timeliness, since undue delay can render reliable information irrelevant, and the balance between benefit and cost, the benefit of information needing to exceed the cost of providing it.

Question 5

State the two underlying assumptions of the Framework and explain, with two examples, how ordinary accounting depends silently on the going concern assumption.

Accepted Answer

The two assumptions are accrual and going concern. Accrual means the effects of transactions are recognised when they occur rather than when cash moves, and are recorded in the period to which they relate; this is what makes financial statements informative about resources and obligations rather than merely about cash. Going concern means the entity is assumed to continue in operation for the foreseeable future and to have neither the intention nor the necessity to liquidate or curtail materially the scale of its operations. Ordinary accounting rests on it constantly without saying so. Depreciating a machine over ten years presupposes that ten years of operation will occur, since if the entity were closing next month the machine would be carried at what it would fetch, not at cost less accumulated depreciation. Valuing inventory at cost presupposes an intention to sell it in the ordinary course of business, whereas an entity in liquidation would carry it at forced-sale value. If the assumption does not hold, the statements must be prepared on a different basis and that fact must be disclosed.

Question 6

The Framework defines income and expenses through changes in assets and liabilities rather than directly. Explain this structural choice and one significant consequence for how standards are written.

Accepted Answer

Income is defined as an increase in economic benefits during the period, in the form of inflows or enhancements of assets or decreases of liabilities, resulting in increases in equity other than contributions from equity participants. Expenses are the mirror image, excluding distributions to equity participants. Both are therefore derived from movements in the balance sheet rather than defined independently, which means profit is a derived concept and not a primary one — the balance sheet is logically prior to the profit and loss account, notwithstanding that most readers look at profit first. The trailing exclusions do necessary work: they are what keeps a share issue out of income and a dividend out of expenses, both of which increase or decrease equity without being performance. The consequence for standards is pervasive. Many standards that appear to be about when to book revenue or cost are in fact written as rules about when an asset or a liability comes into or goes out of existence, because that is where the Framework locates the question. AS 29 is a rule about when a liability exists; the charge to profit follows automatically once it does.

Question 7

Describe the process by which an Accounting Standard is formulated by ICAI, and explain how it acquires legal force in relation to companies. What is the position where ICAI's version and the notified version differ?

Accepted Answer

The Accounting Standards Board of ICAI identifies an area requiring a standard, drawing on international practice, Indian statute and the needs of preparers and users. Study groups prepare a preliminary draft, which the ASB circulates and then issues as an Exposure Draft for public comment over a stated period. Comments received are considered, the draft is revised, and the ASB finalises the standard. It is submitted to the Council of ICAI, which may modify it in consultation with the ASB and then issues it. For companies a further and decisive step follows: standards acquire legal force through the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules notified by the Central Government under section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013, in consultation with the National Financial Reporting Authority. Where ICAI's version and the notified version differ, the notified version prevails for companies, because it is the version carrying statutory force under the Act; ICAI's own version continues to govern non-corporate entities, which are not within the Rules' reach.

Question 8

Distinguish convergence from adoption. Explain what a carve-out is, how it differs from a carve-in, and one consequence of carve-outs for an Indian company's financial statements.

Accepted Answer

Adoption would mean applying IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, without modification. Convergence means issuing national standards that are substantially the same as IFRS but differ in specified respects; India converged rather than adopted, issuing the Indian Accounting Standards. A carve-out is a departure from IFRS that changes the accounting outcome, made because the IFRS treatment was considered inappropriate in the Indian context — the reasons offered being conflict with Indian statute, particularly the Companies Act; economic conditions that make an IFRS assumption inapt; and the preparedness of Indian industry for a specific requirement. A carve-in is different in kind: it is an addition, guidance or an option present in Ind AS that IFRS does not contain, usually to accommodate a transaction common in India. The significant consequence of carve-outs is that financial statements prepared under Ind AS cannot claim unqualified compliance with IFRS, since compliance requires conformity with every requirement. An Indian company wanting to assert IFRS compliance for an overseas listing must address the carve-outs separately.

Question 9

A non-company enterprise had turnover of ₹180 crore and borrowings of ₹35 crore in the immediately preceding accounting year. It is not listed and is not a bank, financial institution or insurer. Classify it, stating which criterion decides the matter and why the other does not disturb the conclusion.

Accepted Answer

The enterprise is Level II. Level I requires turnover exceeding 250 crore or borrowings exceeding 50 crore, or that the enterprise be listed or in the process of listing, or be a bank including a co-operative bank, a financial institution or an insurer, or be the holding or subsidiary of any such entity. None of those is met: turnover of 180 crore is below 250 crore and borrowings of 35 crore are below 50 crore. Level II covers enterprises that are not Level I and whose turnover exceeds 50 crore but does not exceed 250 crore, or whose borrowings exceed 10 crore but do not exceed 50 crore. Turnover of 180 crore falls squarely within the turnover band, which decides the matter. Borrowings of 35 crore also fall within the Level II borrowing band, so the two criteria agree; had they pointed to different levels, the criteria operate disjunctively and the enterprise would take the higher classification, since satisfying either test brings it into that level. The classification is tested against the immediately preceding accounting year, not the current one.

Question 10

A small non-company enterprise with turnover of ₹6 crore and borrowings of ₹1 crore is a subsidiary of a listed company. Its management proposes to claim the exemptions available to Level IV enterprises. Advise them, and state the general rule that governs.

Accepted Answer

The exemptions cannot be claimed. On its own figures the enterprise would be Level IV, since turnover of 6 crore is below the 10 crore Level III threshold and borrowings of 1 crore are below the 2 crore threshold. But the level definitions do not operate on size alone. A listed enterprise is Level I, and the holding and subsidiary enterprises of a Level I enterprise are themselves Level I regardless of their own turnover or borrowings. This enterprise is therefore Level I and must comply with all Accounting Standards in full, with none of the exemptions or relaxations available to Level II, III and IV enterprises, which are together described as MSMEs for accounting purposes. The rule and its rationale are worth stating: the group relationship governs because the subsidiary's figures are consolidated into the parent's statements, and a parent required to comply fully cannot do so if its subsidiary has prepared its own numbers under relaxed requirements. This is the most commonly set trap in applicability questions, because the enterprise's own figures invite the wrong answer and the group relationship is usually mentioned only in passing.

Question 11

Distinguish an accounting policy from an accounting estimate from an accounting standard. Classify each of the following: switching inventory valuation from FIFO to weighted average; revising the useful life of a machine from ten years to seven; and reducing the provision for doubtful debts because a major customer has now paid.

Accepted Answer

An accounting policy is a specific principle, base, convention, rule or practice adopted by an enterprise in preparing and presenting financial statements — the method chosen for valuing inventory, or for depreciating an asset. An accounting estimate is a judgement about an uncertain amount made within a chosen policy — how long a machine will last, how much of the receivables balance will not be collected. An accounting standard is the authoritative document that constrains which policies may be chosen and how estimates must be made and disclosed; it stands above both. Applying this: switching from FIFO to weighted average changes the rule applied to the same facts and is therefore a change in accounting policy. Revising a machine's useful life from ten years to seven is a change in accounting estimate, because the policy — depreciate over useful life — is unchanged and only the judgement about the amount has been revised. Reducing the doubtful debt provision after a customer pays is also a change in estimate, and indeed the clearest case, since new information has resolved part of the uncertainty the estimate existed to address. The distinction matters because AS 5 requires the two to be applied and disclosed differently, which is why questions test it rather than merely define it.

Question 12

An entity sells goods to a financier for ₹50 lakh and simultaneously agrees to repurchase them in twelve months for ₹56 lakh. Legal title passes. The entity proposes to recognise a sale. Apply the relevant qualitative characteristic and state the correct treatment and reasoning.

Accepted Answer

The relevant characteristic is substance over form, a component of reliability, which requires transactions to be accounted for and presented in accordance with their commercial reality rather than merely their legal form. The legal form here is a sale followed by a repurchase, and title genuinely passes. The commercial substance is different: the entity has not disposed of the risks and rewards of ownership, since it is obliged to take the goods back, and it will pay 56 lakh for what it received 50 lakh for. The 6 lakh difference is the price of having 50 lakh for twelve months, which is to say it is a finance charge, computed on the amount and the period exactly as interest would be. The correct treatment is therefore to recognise a secured borrowing of 50 lakh rather than revenue, to continue carrying the goods in inventory since the entity retains the risks and rewards of holding them, and to accrue the 6 lakh as a finance cost over the twelve months. Recognising a sale would report revenue that was never earned, remove inventory the entity is committed to reacquire, and conceal a liability, all of which misrepresent the entity's position to a reader relying on the statements.

Question 13

A candidate argues that because the Framework defines an asset as a controlled resource yielding future benefits, and research expenditure is incurred precisely to produce future benefits, research costs should be capitalised. Identify the errors in this reasoning.

Accepted Answer

There are two errors, one about the Framework's own logic and one about its status. The first is that meeting the definition of an element is only the first of two stages; recognition additionally requires that the flow of future economic benefit be probable and that cost or value be measurable reliably. Research expenditure is, by definition, expenditure undertaken to discover whether a benefit is achievable at all, so at the research stage the flow of benefit is not probable but speculative, and the item fails the recognition test even if it arguably meets the definition. The second error is one of hierarchy. The Framework is not an accounting standard; it does not override any standard, and where a standard conflicts with it the standard prevails. AS 26 addresses this question directly and requires research expenditure to be recognised as an expense when incurred, permitting capitalisation only at the development stage and only where specified conditions are all satisfied. So even if the Framework argument were sound, it could not displace the standard. The general lesson is that the Framework is a tool for predicting and understanding what standards say, never an authority for departing from one.

Question 14

The Framework identifies several categories of user with differing needs, and then resolves the conflict in a particular way. State the resolution and comment on its logical status.

Accepted Answer

The Framework identifies investors, employees, lenders, suppliers and other trade creditors, customers, governments and their agencies, and the public, and notes that their informational needs differ: investors want risk and return, lenders want assurance that loans and interest will be paid when due, employees want stability and the ability to pay remuneration, customers want continuity where they depend on the entity, governments want resource allocation and tax and statistical information, and the public wants the entity's contribution to the local economy. Its resolution is that financial statements meeting the needs of investors, as providers of risk capital, will generally meet most of the needs of the other users as well. The logical status of that resolution is worth noticing, and a good answer says so: it is a judgement rather than a deduction. Nothing about the definition of the users establishes it, and it is contestable — an employee concerned with job security and a lender concerned with covenant compliance do not obviously want the same statements an equity investor wants. The Framework adopts it as a workable simplifying principle, and it explains why the resulting statements are oriented towards performance and financial position rather than, say, towards liquidity horizons or employment.

Question 15

Name the measurement bases described in the Framework and state which predominates in Indian Accounting Standards, giving two examples of where it is modified.

Accepted Answer

The Framework describes four measurement bases. Historical cost records assets at the amount paid and liabilities at the proceeds received or the amount expected to be paid. Current cost records assets at what would have to be paid to acquire an equivalent asset now, and liabilities at the undiscounted amount that would be required to settle now. Realisable or settlement value records assets at what could be obtained by selling in an orderly disposal, and liabilities at the undiscounted amounts expected to be paid in the normal course. Present value discounts future net cash flows expected to be generated by an asset or required to settle a liability. Indian standards are built predominantly on historical cost, which is what makes them relatively verifiable and relatively unresponsive to current values. The predominance is modified in specific cases rather than abandoned: inventories are carried at the lower of cost and net realisable value, and current investments at the lower of cost and fair value, in both cases a departure downwards driven by prudence. Impairment under AS 28 is a third instance of the same asymmetry — a fall below carrying amount is recognised while a rise above it generally is not.

Practice — The Accounting Standards Framework and Applicability

Sign in to save attempts to your dashboard and track your accuracy over time

Find a verified tutor

Join a live course

Browse coaching centres

About

Categories

Support

Documentation

Get Study Tips & Updates

Download Our App

Download for iOS

Download for Android

Popular Cities