By the end of this chapter you'll be able to…

  • 1Distinguish a condition from a warranty and list the implied terms
  • 2State the unpaid seller's rights against goods and the buyer
  • 3Draw the Section 138 timeline and decide whether a complaint is in time
  • 4State the elements of partnership and the liability of partners
💡
Why this chapter matters in Judicial Services (PCS-J)
Cheque dishonour cases are a large part of a magistrate's docket, and Section 138 is asked in almost every cycle. The Sale of Goods and Partnership Acts add predictable list-based questions.

Sale of Goods, Negotiable Instruments and Partnership — Judicial Services

Weightage: Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is among the most asked criminal-law provisions in judicial exams, as cheque cases form a large share of a magistrate's docket. The Sale of Goods Act and Partnership Act appear in the Civil Law paper in many states. Procedural time limits have been amended and now interact with the new criminal procedure code, so confirm the current text.

1. Three Acts, one commercial block

These three statutes govern everyday commerce. A sale moves goods for a price, a negotiable instrument moves money by paper, and a partnership is a way to carry on a business together. Learn each as a short list of rules.

2. Sale of Goods Act, 1930: the basics

A contract of sale is a contract where the seller transfers or agrees to transfer property in goods to the buyer for a price (Section 4). It is a sale when the property passes at once and an agreement to sell when it passes later, and the distinction decides who bears the risk and who can sue.

  • Goods include all movables except money and actionable claims.
  • Property passes when the parties intend it to pass (Section 19), and risk follows property (Section 26).
  • Ascertained goods pass property on contract, but unascertained goods only when goods are ascertained and appropriated (Sections 18 and 23).

3. Conditions and warranties

A condition is essential to the main purpose of the contract, and its breach lets the buyer repudiate the contract. A warranty is collateral, and its breach gives only a claim for damages (Section 12). A condition can be treated as a warranty if the buyer chooses to accept the goods (Section 13).

The implied terms are:

  • Section 14: the seller has the right to sell, goods are free from encumbrances, and the buyer has quiet possession.
  • Section 15: goods sold by description must match.
  • Section 16(1): fitness for purpose, where the buyer relies on the seller's skill.
  • Section 16(2): merchantable quality where goods are bought by description from a seller who deals in such goods.

Caveat emptor (let the buyer beware) is the general rule in Section 16, subject to these exceptions.

4. Transfer of title

Nemo dat quod non habet: no one can give a better title than they have (Section 27). The exceptions protect innocent buyers: sale by a mercantile agent (Section 27 proviso and the Factors Act principles), sale by a joint owner in possession, sale under a voidable title that has not been avoided before sale (Section 29), and sale by a seller in possession after sale (Section 30).

5. The unpaid seller

An unpaid seller is one who has not been paid the whole price (Section 45). Rights against the goods, even if property has passed, are:

  1. Lien (Section 47): retaining possession until payment.
  2. Stoppage in transit (Section 50): on the buyer's insolvency.
  3. Resale (Section 54): after giving notice, if the goods are perishable or the buyer fails to pay.

Rights against the buyer: a suit for the price (Section 55) and for damages for non-acceptance (Section 56).

6. The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

A negotiable instrument is a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque payable to order or bearer (Section 13). A cheque is a bill of exchange drawn on a banker and payable on demand (Section 6). The features are free transferability, the holder in due course takes free from defects of title, and presumptions operate in favour of the holder.

  • Section 118: presumption that the instrument was made for consideration.
  • Section 139: presumption that the cheque was issued for the discharge of a debt or liability.

These presumptions are rebuttable on the balance of probabilities, and the accused need not enter the witness box to rebut them (Rangappa v. Sri Mohan, 2010).

7. Section 138: dishonour of cheque

Where a cheque drawn for a debt or other liability is returned unpaid for insufficiency of funds or because it exceeds the arrangement, the drawer commits an offence, punishable with imprisonment up to two years, or a fine up to twice the amount of the cheque, or both. The conditions:

  1. The cheque was drawn on an account maintained by the drawer, for payment of a legally enforceable debt or liability.
  2. The cheque was presented within its validity, which is three months from the date or the period of validity, whichever is earlier.
  3. The payee gave a written notice of demand within 30 days of receiving the bank's information of dishonour (Section 138(b)).
  4. The drawer failed to pay within 15 days of receipt of the notice (Section 138(c)).

The complaint must be filed within one month after the cause of action arises, that is, after the 15 days expire (Section 142(b)), and the court may condone delay for sufficient cause.

8. Procedure and jurisdiction in cheque cases

  • Offence by companies: Section 141 makes persons in charge of the company liable.
  • Jurisdiction: Section 142(2) places jurisdiction in the court within whose local limits the payee's bank account is maintained, after the 2015 amendment, in reaction to Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod (2014).
  • The offence is compoundable (Section 147), and the summary trial procedure is available.
  • Interim compensation: Section 143A (up to 20 per cent of the cheque amount) and Section 148 (deposit of at least 20 per cent in appeal) were added in 2018.
  • Section 138 is a criminal liability, and a separate civil suit is permitted.

Courts have also directed measures such as electronic service of summons in cheque cases and the use of summary trial, so check the current guidelines.

9. The Partnership Act, 1932

Partnership is the relation between persons who have agreed to share the profits of a business carried on by all or any of them acting for all (Section 4). The elements are an agreement, a business, profit sharing and mutual agency.

  • It arises from contract, not status. A registered firm can sue, an unregistered one cannot enforce a contract against third parties (Section 69), though it can claim set-off and sue for dissolution.
  • Each partner is an agent of the firm (Section 18) and is jointly and severally liable for the firm's acts (Section 25).
  • Section 19: the implied authority of a partner to bind the firm.
  • Section 32: retirement, and Section 43 and 44: dissolution at will or by the court on grounds such as unsoundness of mind, just and equitable.
  • A minor may be admitted to the benefits of a firm but is not liable personally (Section 30).

10. A problem-answer pattern

A drawer's cheque for ₹5 lakh is dishonoured on 1 March for insufficient funds. The payee gets the memo on 3 March and sends a demand on 25 March. The drawer does not pay, and the payee files a complaint on 30 April. Answer in four steps:

  1. The demand was within 30 days of 3 March, so it is valid.
  2. Assuming the notice was received on 25 March, the 15 days to pay expired on 9 April.
  3. The complaint was due within a month of that date, by 9 May, so it is in time.
  4. The offence is made out if the debt was legally enforceable, which Section 139 presumes.

Common traps judicial exams set here

  • Treating a condition and a warranty alike. Breach of a condition allows repudiation; breach of a warranty gives only damages.
  • Counting the 30 days from the date of dishonour. They run from receipt of the bank's information.
  • Skipping the 15-day period before filing. The complaint cannot be filed before it ends.
  • Applying nemo dat without its exceptions. The innocent buyer is protected in four cases.
  • Saying an unregistered firm cannot sue at all. It cannot enforce a contract, but other claims survive.

Memory aids

  • "30 days notice, 15 days to pay, one month to file": Section 138 clock.
  • "Lien, stop, resell": the unpaid seller's rights against goods.
  • "Condition repudiates, warranty compensates": the two terms.

Summary

The Sale of Goods Act distinguishes conditions from warranties, protects innocent buyers in four exceptions to nemo dat and gives the unpaid seller lien, stoppage and resale. Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act makes cheque dishonour an offence with a strict three-step clock.

Partnership is a contract of mutual agency, with joint liability and limits on unregistered firms.

Exam protocol

  • Draw the Section 138 timeline before answering.
  • Say whether a term is a condition or a warranty.
  • Name the section for each unpaid seller right.

Key formulas & results

Everything to memorise for the exam hall, in one card. Screenshot this for revision.

Section 138 timeline
Notice runs from the bank's information filing runs from the 15th day.
Penalty
Section 138 punishment.
⚠️

Traps Judicial Services (PCS-J) sets — and how to dodge them

These are the exact option-traps and misreads that cost marks under negative marking.

WATCH OUT
✗ Counting the 30 days from the date of dishonour.
✓ They run from the date of receipt of the bank's information.
WATCH OUT
✗ Filing a Section 138 complaint before the 15 days expire.
✓ The cause of action arises only after the 15 days lapse.
WATCH OUT
✗ Treating conditions and warranties alike.
✓ A condition permits repudiation a warranty gives only damages.
WATCH OUT
✗ Applying nemo dat without exceptions.
✓ Innocent buyers are protected in four recognised cases.
WATCH OUT
✗ Saying an unregistered firm cannot sue for anything.
✓ It cannot enforce a contract, but other claims survive.

Exam-pattern practice

PYQ-style questions with full solutions. Work through them as a readiness check — mark yourself honestly and get your gap report at the end.

Readiness check

Are you exam-ready for Sale of Goods, Negotiable Instruments and Partnership?

8 problems from this chapter. Try each one, reveal the worked solution, mark yourself honestly — get your gap report at the end.

8 questions~6 min

5-minute revision

The whole chapter, distilled. Read this the night before the exam.

  • •Sale of Goods: Section 4 sale and agreement to sell Section 12 condition and warranty.
  • •Implied terms: Sections 14 to 16 caveat emptor nemo dat Section 27.
  • •Unpaid seller: lien 47, stoppage 50, resale 54 price suit 55.
  • •NI Act: Sections 118 and 139 presumptions Section 138 elements.
  • •Section 138 clock: 30 days notice, 15 days to pay, one month to file.
  • •Section 141 companies Section 142(2) jurisdiction Sections 143A and 148 (2018).
  • •Partnership: Section 4, 18, 25, 69, 30 mutual agency.

Judicial Services (PCS-J) question blueprint

How this topic is asked, tier by tier — so you can prep to the pattern.

Typical weightage: 25

Question styleMarks eachTypical countWhat it tests
Section 138 penalty~2-4 marks in a typical paper
Unpaid seller~2-4 marks in a typical paper
Condition and warranty~4-6 marks in a typical paper
Presumption~4-6 marks in a typical paper
Partnership~4-6 marks in a typical paper
Timeline problem~8-10 marks in a typical paper
Nemo dat~6-8 marks in a typical paper
Jurisdiction~2-4 marks in a typical paper
Prep strategy
  • Section 138 timeline every time
  • Unpaid seller list
  • Partnership card

Exam-hall strategy

Battle-tested tips from mentors and toppers for this topic under the sectional clock.

  1. Draw the Section 138 timeline for every problem.
  2. Learn the unpaid seller's rights as a three-item list with sections.
  3. Keep partnership sections on a single card.

Beyond the exam

Where this skill shows up in the job you're competing for — and in life.

Magistrate dockets

Cheque dishonour complaints are among the most numerous cases before magistrates, so the timeline is applied daily.

Commercial disputes

Sale and partnership disputes come to civil courts as suits for price, damages and accounts.

Where else this topic is tested

Prepare once, score in every exam that asks it.

Judicial Services Mains, Criminal Law paperNegotiable Instruments Act within the paper
Judicial Services Mains, Civil Law paperSale of Goods and Partnership in some states

Questions aspirants ask

Pulled from the Q&A community and mentor sessions.

Yes, under Section 147, and many cases end by settlement.

The Negotiable Instruments Act has its own procedure, read with the BNSS for the rest. Check the current provisions and court guidelines.
Header Logo