Struggle for Freedom — The Early Phase
Introduction
The Indian freedom struggle was a long and complex movement spanning nearly a century. The early phase (roughly 1857–1919) saw the transition from moderate constitutional politics to more assertive nationalist agitation. This chapter covers the formation of political associations, the founding of the Indian National Congress, the partition of Bengal, the Swadeshi Movement, the Home Rule Movement, and the turning point of Jallianwala Bagh.
Section 1: Early Political Associations
Before the formation of the Indian National Congress, various regional political associations voiced Indian demands.
| Association | Founded | Founder(s) | Key Demand |
|---|---|---|---|
| Landholders' Society | 1838 | Zamindars of Bengal | Protection of landlord interests |
| Bombay Association | 1852 | Dadabhai Naoroji, Jagannath Shankarseth | Indian representation in government |
| Madras Native Association | 1852 | Gazulu Lakshminarasu Chetty | Civil rights and representation |
| British Indian Association | 1851 | Raja Radhakanta Deb, Debendranath Tagore | Political reforms |
| East India Association | 1866 | Dadabhai Naoroji (in London) | Presenting Indian views to British public |
| Indian League | 1875 | Sisir Kumar Ghosh | Political education and agitation |
| Indian Association | 1876 | Surendranath Banerjee | United political action across India |
| Poona Sarvajanik Sabha | 1870 | Mahadev Govind Ranade | Representing people's grievances |
| Madras Mahajana Sabha | 1884 | M. Veeraraghavachari | Coordinated political action in the south |
Section 2: The Indian National Congress (Founded 1885)
Formation
The Indian National Congress (INC) was founded in December 1885 at Gokuldas Tejpal Sanskrit College, Bombay.
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Founder | Allan Octavian Hume (retired British civil servant) |
| First President | Womesh Chunder Bonnerjee |
| First session | Bombay, 1885 — 72 delegates attended |
| Initial aim | A platform for educated Indians to express their views to the British government |
The Moderates (1885–1905)
The early phase of the Congress is called the Moderate Phase or the phase of 'Political Begging.'
| Leader | Key Contribution |
|---|---|
| Dadabhai Naoroji | Poverty and Un-British Rule in India — Drain of Wealth theory |
| Pherozeshah Mehta | Constitutional agitation, Bombay Municipal Corporation |
| Gopal Krishna Gokhale | Servants of India Society (1905); Gandhi's political guru |
| Surendranath Banerjee | Indian Association, agitation against partition of Bengal |
| Mahadev Govind Ranade | Nationalist historian, reformer |
Methods of the Moderates:
- Prayer, petition, and protest — constitutional methods
- Annual Congress sessions to pass resolutions
- Appeals to British public and Parliament
- Demands for administrative reforms, Indianisation of civil services
Achievements:
- Created a national political consciousness
- Exposed the exploitative nature of British rule (Naoroji)
- Laid the foundation for mass nationalism
Section 3: The Partition of Bengal (1905)
Background
- Bengal was the largest province of British India — population of ~80 million
- The British argued that Bengal was too large to administer efficiently
- Indians believed the real motive was 'divide and rule' — splitting the Hindu and Muslim populations
The Partition
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Announced | July 19, 1905 |
| Implemented | October 16, 1905 |
| Viceroy | Lord Curzon |
| New provinces | West Bengal (Hindu-majority) and East Bengal & Assam (Muslim-majority) |
Indian Reaction
The partition sparked a massive nationalist response:
- Boycott of British goods
- Swadeshi Movement — promotion of Indian-made goods
- National education — establishment of national schools and colleges
- Public meetings, processions, and demonstrations
- Ravindra Nath Tagore composed 'Amar Shonar Bangla' (later Bangladesh's national anthem)
- Tilak used Ganpati and Shivaji festivals to mobilise masses
Section 4: The Swadeshi Movement (1905–1908)
| Aspect | Description |
|---|---|
| Meaning | 'Swadeshi' means 'of one's own country' — using Indian-made goods |
| Slogan | Vande Mataram (Hail Motherland) — from Bankim Chandra Chatterjee's novel Anandamath |
| Methods | Boycott of British goods, burning of foreign cloth, promotion of indigenous industries |
| Leaders | Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Lala Lajpat Rai, Bipin Chandra Pal — the Lal-Bal-Pal trio |
| Spread | From Bengal to Maharashtra, Punjab, and other parts of India |
| Significance | First mass movement in India's freedom struggle |
The Extremists
A new trend within the Congress — the 'Extremists' or 'Garams' (Hot Faction) — emerged alongside the Moderates ('Narams' or Soft Faction).
| Extremist Leader | Approach |
|---|---|
| Bal Gangadhar Tilak | 'Swaraj is my birthright and I shall have it' |
| Lala Lajpat Rai | Punjab's fiery nationalist leader |
| Bipin Chandra Pal | Bengali nationalist, orator |
Differences between Moderates and Extremists:
| Aspect | Moderates | Extremists |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | Colonial self-government within British Empire | Complete independence (Swaraj) |
| Methods | Prayers, petitions | Boycott, passive resistance |
| Attitude to British | Believed in British sense of justice | Distrusted British intentions |
| Mass participation | Limited to educated elite | Attempted to mobilise masses |
| Key leaders | Naoroji, Gokhale, Banerjee | Tilak, Lajpat Rai, Pal |
Section 5: The Home Rule Movement (1916–1918)
Background
- World War I (1914–1918) — India supported Britain but expected political reforms in return
- Repression during the war created resentment
- Annie Besant, an Irish-born theosophist, emerged as a major nationalist leader
Two Leagues
| League | Founder | Year | Headquarters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Home Rule League | Bal Gangadhar Tilak | April 1916 | Pune |
| All India Home Rule League | Annie Besant | September 1916 | Madras |
Demands:
- Self-government (Home Rule) for India within the British Empire
- More Indians in the legislative councils
- Political reforms after the war
Significance:
- Brought women into political activism (led by Annie Besant)
- Spread nationalist ideas to smaller towns
- Created pressure for constitutional reforms
Section 6: The Lucknow Pact (1916)
An important unity between the Congress and the All India Muslim League (founded 1906, Dhaka):
- Both parties agreed to present joint demands to the British
- Congress accepted separate electorates for Muslims
- Muslim League supported Congress's demand for self-government
- Showed Hindu-Muslim unity in the freedom struggle
Section 7: Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms (1919)
Also known as the Government of India Act 1919, based on the report of Secretary of State Edwin Montagu and Viceroy Lord Chelmsford.
Key features:
- Introduced Dyarchy (dual government) in provinces
- Transferred subjects (education, health, agriculture) to Indian ministers
- Reserved subjects (finance, police, justice) remained with British governors
- Bicameral legislature at the centre
Indian reaction:
- The reforms were seen as inadequate and disappointing
- Dyarchy was unworkable
- The British had no intention of granting real self-government
Section 8: The Rowlatt Act (1919)
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Purpose | To suppress nationalist agitation |
| Provisions | Arrest without warrant; detention without trial; secret trial |
| Indian reaction | Widespread outrage — seen as a violation of civil liberties |
| Gandhi's response | Called for a nationwide hartal (strike) on April 6, 1919 |
Section 9: The Jallianwala Bagh Massacre (April 13, 1919)
Events
- A public meeting was held at Jallianwala Bagh, Amritsar, to protest the Rowlatt Act
- The gathering was peaceful — people were celebrating Baisakhi
- General Dyer ordered troops to open fire without warning
- The Bagh had only one narrow entrance — no escape for the crowd
- ~1,000 people were killed and over 2,000 wounded (official estimate)
- Firing continued for 10–15 minutes until ammunition ran out
Aftermath
- Rabindranath Tagore returned his knighthood in protest
- Sir Shankar Nair resigned from the Viceroy's Council
- The Hunter Commission condemned Dyer's actions
- Dyer was removed from command
- The massacre shattered any remaining faith Indians had in British justice
- Gandhi decided to launch the Non-Cooperation Movement — a turning point
ICSE Exam Focus
| Question Type | Marks | Key Areas |
|---|---|---|
| Formation of INC | 4 | Year, founders, first session, early demands |
| Moderates vs Extremists | 4 | Differences in goals, methods, leadership |
| Partition of Bengal (1905) | 4 | Causes, reaction, Swadeshi movement |
| Home Rule Movement | 3 | Tilak, Besant, Lucknow Pact |
| Rowlatt Act and Jallianwala | 4 | Events, consequences, significance |
Common Mistakes in ICSE Exams
| Mistake | Correction |
|---|---|
| Thinking the INC was founded by an Indian | A.O. Hume (British) was the founder |
| Confusing Moderates with Extremists | Know their different goals and methods |
| Forgetting the Lucknow Pact (1916) | It was a key Congress-Muslim League agreement |
| Ignoring the impact of World War I on nationalism | WWI created economic hardship and raised expectations |
| Missing Jallianwala as a turning point | It transformed the freedom struggle |
Self-Test Questions
Q1: When and where was the Indian National Congress founded? A1: The Indian National Congress was founded in December 1885 in Bombay, at Gokuldas Tejpal Sanskrit College. A.O. Hume was the founder, and W.C. Bonnerjee was the first president.
Q2: What were the differences between the Moderates and the Extremists? A2: The Moderates believed in constitutional methods (prayer, petition, protest) and wanted self-government within the Empire. The Extremists, led by Tilak, demanded complete Swaraj and used methods like boycott and passive resistance.
Q3: Why was the Partition of Bengal (1905) opposed by Indians? A3: Indians believed the partition was a 'divide and rule' tactic to split Hindus and Muslims. It sparked the Swadeshi Movement, which involved boycotting British goods and promoting Indian-made products.
Q4: What was the significance of the Lucknow Pact (1916)? A4: The Lucknow Pact united the Congress and the Muslim League in presenting joint demands to the British. Congress accepted separate electorates for Muslims, and both parties agreed to demand self-government.
Q5: What happened at Jallianwala Bagh and why was it a turning point? A5: On April 13, 1919, General Dyer ordered troops to fire on a peaceful gathering at Jallianwala Bagh, Amritsar, killing ~1,000 people. The massacre destroyed faith in British justice and led Gandhi to launch the Non-Cooperation Movement, marking the start of the Gandhian era.
Key Dates to Remember
| Year | Event |
|---|---|
| 1885 | Indian National Congress founded |
| 1905 | Partition of Bengal; Swadeshi Movement begins |
| 1906 | All India Muslim League founded |
| 1916 | Home Rule Movement; Lucknow Pact |
| 1919 | Rowlatt Act; Jallianwala Bagh massacre; Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms |
Final Summary
The early phase of India's freedom struggle (1885–1919) was a period of political awakening and experimentation. The Indian National Congress provided a national platform. The Moderates laid the foundations through constitutional agitation. The Partition of Bengal and the Swadeshi Movement brought mass participation for the first time. The Home Rule Movement sustained the demand for self-government during World War I. The Jallianwala Bagh massacre was the breaking point — it destroyed trust in British benevolence and set the stage for Gandhi's mass movements. For ICSE students, this period shows how the Indian national movement evolved from elite politics to mass struggle.
