By the end of this chapter you'll be able to…

  • 1Write tangents and normals to a curve, including from an external point, and find the angle between two curves or the condition for them to be orthogonal
  • 2State monotonicity correctly on an interval, including the isolated-zero refinement that keeps strictly increasing
  • 3Locate the greatest and least values on a closed interval by testing stationary points, points of non-differentiability and endpoints
  • 4Classify critical points by the first derivative test when the second derivative test is silent
  • 5Find asymptotes and assemble a curve sketch from domain, intercepts, asymptotes and the signs of the first two derivatives
  • 6Prove inequalities by monotonicity and count the real roots of a parametrised equation from its critical values
💡
Why this chapter matters in JEE Advanced
Advanced sets optimisation problems whose answer changes character with a parameter, so the marks go to candidates who ask where the critical point is allowed to be rather than only where the derivative vanishes. The chapter is also the paper's main source of proof-style questions: an inequality established by monotonicity and a root count read off from two critical values are both standard, and both are graded on the reasoning rather than the arithmetic. Everything here is reused in Integrals, in coordinate geometry and in the physics paper's optimisation questions.

Before you start — revise these

🔗
Differentiation of standard functions, including implicit differentiation
🔗
The equation of a line through a point with a given slope
🔗
The discriminant condition for a quadratic to keep one sign
🔗
Limits at infinity and the idea of an asymptote

Application of Derivatives

Which point of the parabola is closest to ? The vertex, surely — it is the only point the axis of symmetry singles out.

It is not. The two closest points are at , a distance away, while the vertex is a full away.

Write and substitute , giving . This is a parabola in with minimum at , which is admissible, so and .

What makes the question worth asking is that the answer changes character with the height of the point. Replacing by a general gives , whose unconstrained minimum sits at . That value is admissible only when ; below that threshold the minimum of over occurs at the boundary , and the vertex genuinely is the nearest point.

So the correct answer is a pair of cases, not a formula. Recognising that a constraint can push the optimum to the boundary of its domain is the single most examined idea in this chapter, and it is the reason candidates who differentiate correctly still lose the marks.

(0, 2) vertex 1.32 1.32 2 below a height of one half the vertex wins; above it, these two points do

1. Tangents, normals and the angle between curves

At a point on a curve, the tangent has slope and the normal has slope . Everything about tangency reduces to those two lines and the conditions imposed on them.

The angle between two curves at a common point is the angle between their tangents there:

so the curves are orthogonal exactly when , and they touch when . A question asking for the condition that two families cut at right angles is asking for that product to be at every common point.

Illustration 1

Show that the curves and intersect orthogonally.

Differentiating implicitly, the first gives , so . The second gives , so . Their product is at every point, so the two families are orthogonal wherever they meet — no common point ever needs to be found.

Illustration 2

Find the equations of the tangents to that pass through .

The point of contact is unknown, so call it . The tangent there has slope , and it passes through when

So or , giving the tangents and . Parametrising the point of contact, rather than the line, is what makes external-tangent questions routine.

2. Monotonicity, stated correctly

A differentiable function is increasing on an interval when there, and strictly increasing when in addition vanishes only at isolated points. That refinement matters: has yet is strictly increasing everywhere, because the derivative is positive on both sides and the single zero cannot flatten an interval.

The condition is about an interval, not a point. A function can have at a point without being increasing on any interval around it, which is another consequence of a derivative not having to be continuous.

Illustration 3

For which is increasing on all of ?

We need for every . A quadratic with positive leading coefficient is non-negative everywhere exactly when its discriminant is at most zero:

At the endpoints the derivative touches zero at a single point, which is permitted, so the interval is closed.

3. The three places an extremum can hide

On a closed interval, the greatest and least values of a continuous function occur at one of three kinds of point: an interior point where , an interior point where fails to exist, or an endpoint. Checking only the first is the standard way to lose an optimisation question.

f' = 0 corner: f' undefined endpoint: the true maximum a b all three kinds must be tested, then compared by value

That the greatest and least values exist at all is itself a theorem, and it needs both hypotheses: the function continuous, and the interval closed and bounded. On the open interval the function has no greatest value, since it approaches without reaching it, and on a function with a jump can miss its supremum in the same way.

A question set on an open interval or an unbounded one is therefore asking for a supremum rather than a maximum, and the honest answer may well be that no maximum is attained anywhere on the given domain.

To classify an interior critical point, the first derivative test reads the sign of on either side and is always decisive. The second derivative test is quicker — means a minimum and a maximum — but it is silent when , and silence is not evidence.

Illustration 4

Classify the critical point of at the origin.

Here and , so the second derivative test says nothing. The first derivative test settles it at once: is negative for and positive for , so the origin is a minimum. Compare , where the same two derivatives vanish but the sign of does not change, so there is no extremum at all.

Illustration 5

Find the greatest and least values of on .

, so the interior critical points are and . Evaluating at all four candidates,

The least value is at the left endpoint and the greatest is , attained twice — once at an interior maximum and once at an endpoint. Had only the critical points been checked, the least value would have been reported as .

Illustration 6

A right circular cylinder is inscribed in a sphere of radius . Find its greatest volume.

With half-height , the radius satisfies , so

Then , vanishing at , and there, confirming a maximum. Substituting gives

The endpoints and both give zero volume, so the interior critical point is genuinely the answer — but saying so requires having looked.

4. Concavity, inflection and the shape of a curve

The sign of describes bending: positive means concave upwards, negative concave downwards. A point of inflection is where the concavity changes, which requires to vanish or fail to exist there and to change sign across it. A vanishing second derivative alone is not enough, exactly as a vanishing first derivative alone does not give an extremum.

Sketching a curve is then a matter of assembling five pieces of information: the domain, the intercepts, the asymptotes, the sign of , and the sign of .

minimum inflection maximum f' < 0 f' > 0 f' < 0 bending upwards bending downwards

Illustration 7

Locate the points of inflection of .

, which vanishes at and . Since is a quadratic with distinct roots, it changes sign at each, so both are genuine inflection points. Note that as well, so the origin is a stationary point of inflection — flat, but not an extremum.

Asymptotes complete the picture and are found by three separate limits. A vertical asymptote sits where the function is unbounded, typically at a zero of a denominator that is not cancelled by the numerator. A horizontal asymptote is a finite value of . When that limit is infinite, an oblique asymptote may still exist, and the quickest route to it is polynomial division: whatever remains after the linear part tends to zero.

Illustration 8

Sketch , identifying its asymptotes and extrema.

Dividing, , so the oblique asymptote is and there is a vertical asymptote at . Then

which vanishes when , that is at and , with values and .

The sign of the derivative shows that is a local maximum and a local minimum — and the local maximum value is smaller than the local minimum value . There is no contradiction: the two lie on different branches, separated by the vertical asymptote, and "local" means only local. A candidate who assumes a maximum must exceed a minimum will misread this curve entirely.

local max, value 0 local min, value 4 x = 1 y = x + 1 the two branches never see each other, so a local maximum can sit below a local minimum

5. Monotonicity as a proof technique

Most inequalities in this chapter are proved by showing that a difference is zero at one endpoint and monotone thereafter. Define as the difference of the two sides, show , and show beyond.

Illustration 9

Prove that for every .

Let . Then and , with equality only at isolated multiples of . So is strictly increasing on and therefore positive for .

This is where the isolated-zero refinement earns its keep: does vanish, infinitely often, yet the conclusion is still strict.

Illustration 10

Prove that for every real , with equality only at .

Let , so and . The derivative is negative for and positive for , so decreases to a minimum at the origin and increases after. The minimum value is , so everywhere with equality only there.

Notice that a single monotonicity argument would not have worked, because is not monotone; splitting at the critical point was necessary.

Illustration 11

Prove that for .

Let . Then and on the open interval. So is strictly increasing from zero and hence positive, and dividing by the positive gives the result.

6. Counting roots from a shape

The number of real roots of is the number of times the graph crosses the axis, and the graph's shape is fixed by its critical values. For a cubic with two critical points, three real roots require the two critical values to have opposite signs.

Illustration 12

For how many real values does have three distinct real roots?

Let , with vanishing at . The local maximum is and the local minimum is .

Three distinct roots need the maximum above the axis and the minimum below:

At one critical value touches the axis and two roots merge; outside the interval only one real root survives. Reading the answer from the two critical values is far quicker than any attempt at the cubic's discriminant.

Illustration 13

Show that has no solution for , exactly one for , and two for .

Rearranged, the question asks how often the horizontal line meets for . Now , which is negative on and positive after, so falls to a minimum and rises thereafter, tending to infinity at both ends. The line therefore misses the graph below , touches it at , and cuts it twice above.

7. Rates of change and approximation

If two quantities are related, differentiating the relation with respect to time relates their rates. The only skill is writing the relation before differentiating, and eliminating any variable that is not needed.

For small changes, , which turns a hard evaluation into an easy one plus a correction.

Illustration 14

A spherical balloon is inflated so its volume grows at . How fast is the radius growing when cm?

From , differentiating with respect to time gives , so

The rate falls as the balloon grows, since the same volume must spread over a larger surface — a check that the algebra agrees with the physics.

Illustration 15

Approximate .

Take at , where and . With ,

The true value is , so the error is about , consistent with a second-order term of size .

Summary

An optimisation problem is not finished when the derivative is set to zero. The critical point must be admissible, and when a substitution introduces a restriction such as , the optimum can be pushed to the boundary — which is why the nearest point on to is the vertex for and a symmetric pair above it.

On a closed interval, the greatest and least values live at interior stationary points, at interior points where the derivative does not exist, or at the endpoints, and all three must be evaluated and compared. The second derivative test is quicker than the first but silent when vanishes, and silence is not evidence: and have the same first two derivatives at the origin and behave completely differently.

Monotonicity requires on an interval, and isolated zeros of do not spoil strictness. That refinement makes monotonicity the standard way to prove an inequality: set equal to the difference, check that it vanishes at an endpoint, and show the derivative keeps its sign — splitting at a critical point when the difference is not monotone throughout.

Asymptotes are found by three limits — a vertical one at an uncancelled zero of a denominator, a horizontal one from the limit at infinity, and an oblique one from polynomial division. When a vertical asymptote separates two branches, a local maximum on one can sit below a local minimum on the other, which is a standard way to mislead.

The number of real roots is read from the critical values: a cubic has three distinct roots exactly when its local maximum and local minimum straddle the axis. Tangency and orthogonality are conditions on slopes, and a tangent from an external point is found by parametrising the point of contact rather than the line.

Key formulas & results

Everything to memorise for the exam hall, in one card. Screenshot this for revision.

Tangent and normal
With $m=\left.\tfrac{dy}{dx}\right|_{(x_1,y_1)}$. For a tangent through an external point, parametrise the point of contact rather than the line.
Angle between curves
Orthogonal when $m_1m_2=-1$, touching when $m_1=m_2$. A condition on two families is a statement about that product at every common point.
Increasing and decreasing
Strictly increasing if in addition $f'$ vanishes only at isolated points, which is why $x^{3}$ qualifies despite $f'(0)=0$. The condition is about an interval, never a single point.
Monotone for all $x$
The standard route when a cubic must be increasing everywhere: apply the discriminant condition to its quadratic derivative, and note that the endpoints are included.
Where an extremum can be
All three kinds must be evaluated and compared by value. Checking only stationary points is the most common way to lose an optimisation question.
Extreme value theorem
Both hypotheses matter. On an open interval the bounds may be approached but never reached, so the honest answer can be that no maximum exists.
First derivative test
Always decisive. Positive to negative is a maximum, negative to positive a minimum, and no change means no extremum, as at the origin for $x^{3}$.
Second derivative test
Silent when $f''(c)=0$, and silence is not evidence. $x^{4}$ and $x^{3}$ share their first two derivatives at the origin and behave differently.
Concavity and inflection
A vanishing second derivative alone is not an inflection, exactly as a vanishing first derivative alone is not an extremum.
Asymptotes
Vertical at an uncancelled zero of a denominator; horizontal from $\lim_{x\to\pm\infty}f$; oblique from polynomial division, the remainder tending to zero.
Inequality by monotonicity
The standard proof template. If $g$ is not monotone throughout, split at its critical point and argue on each side, as for $e^{x}\ge1+x$.
Root count for a cubic
Three distinct real roots exactly when the two critical values straddle the axis. Equality gives a repeated root; the same sign gives one real root.
Related rates and approximation
Write the geometric relation first and eliminate every variable not needed. The approximation's error is of order $\tfrac12\left|f''\right|\Delta x^{2}$.
⚠️

Traps JEE Advanced sets — and how to dodge them

These are the exact option-traps and misreads that cost marks under negative marking.

WATCH OUT
Accepting a critical point without checking that it lies in the allowed range
After substituting, state the restriction the new variable inherits. With the optimum can be forced to the boundary .
Why it happens: A substitution feels like a relabelling, so the domain it carries is dropped, and the unconstrained minimum of the new expression is reported instead.
WATCH OUT
Testing only stationary points on a closed interval
Evaluate at the endpoints and at any corner as well, then compare all the values.
Why it happens: The phrase "maximum value" is mentally attached to "derivative zero", and in most textbook examples the two happen to coincide.
WATCH OUT
Concluding no extremum when
Fall back on the first derivative test, which is always decisive. has a minimum at the origin even though .
Why it happens: The second derivative test is presented as the standard method, so a zero result is read as a verdict rather than as the absence of one.
WATCH OUT
Requiring everywhere for strict increase
Isolated zeros are allowed. is strictly increasing, and is strictly increasing although its derivative vanishes infinitely often.
Why it happens: The two statements and "strictly increasing" are often quoted as equivalent, and the isolated-zero refinement is left out of the summary.
WATCH OUT
Assuming a local maximum value exceeds a local minimum value
Check whether an asymptote separates them. For the local maximum is and the local minimum is .
Why it happens: On a connected graph the assumption is correct, and the possibility of two branches that never meet is not part of the mental picture.
WATCH OUT
Solving the cubic when counting roots of a parametrised equation
Compute the two critical values and ask whether they straddle the axis. The condition is a pair of inequalities in the parameter.
Why it happens: The equation is written in a solvable-looking form, so the algebraic route is attempted before the graphical one is considered.

Exam-pattern practice

PYQ-style questions with full solutions. Work through them as a readiness check — mark yourself honestly and get your gap report at the end.

Readiness check

Are you exam-ready for Application of Derivatives?

12 problems from this chapter. Try each one, reveal the worked solution, mark yourself honestly — get your gap report at the end.

12 questions~8 min worth ~8 marks in JEE Advanced exams

5-minute revision

The whole chapter, distilled. Read this the night before the exam.

  • A critical point counts only if it is admissible; a substitution such as carries the restriction with it.
  • When the optimum is pushed to a boundary, the answer becomes a pair of cases rather than a formula.
  • On a closed interval, test stationary points, points where fails to exist, and both endpoints, then compare values.
  • The bounds are attained only if the function is continuous and the interval closed and bounded.
  • The second derivative test is silent when ; the first derivative test is always decisive.
  • with isolated zeros still gives strict increase, which is what makes and strictly increasing.
  • A cubic is monotone on exactly when its quadratic derivative has non-positive discriminant.
  • An inflection needs to change sign, not merely to vanish.
  • Oblique asymptotes come from polynomial division; the remainder must tend to zero.
  • Across a vertical asymptote a local maximum can sit below a local minimum, since the branches are separate.
  • To prove an inequality, take the difference, check it vanishes at an endpoint, and show its derivative keeps its sign.
  • A cubic has three distinct real roots exactly when its two critical values have opposite signs.

JEE Advanced question blueprint

How this topic is asked, tier by tier — so you can prep to the pattern.

Typical weightage: ~2 questions (roughly 6-8 marks) across the two papers combined, out of the ~120 marks of Mathematics

Question styleMarks eachTypical countWhat it tests
Tangents, normals and rates of change31Tangents and normals including from an external point, angles between curves and orthogonality, related rates, and approximation by differentials
Monotonicity, maxima and minima41Monotonicity on an interval, parameter ranges for a monotone function, extrema on closed intervals including endpoints and corners, and classification when the second derivative test is silent
Curve shape, inequalities and root counting31Concavity, inflection and asymptotes, curve sketching, inequalities proved by monotonicity, and the number of real roots of a parametrised equation

Exam-hall strategy

Battle-tested tips from mentors and toppers for this topic under the sectional clock.

  1. After any substitution, write down the range the new variable inherits before differentiating. That one line prevents the most expensive error in the chapter.
  2. On a closed interval, list all candidate points first and evaluate them in a short table. Comparing values is where the marks are, not in the differentiation.
  3. If the second derivative vanishes at a critical point, switch to sign analysis immediately rather than trying a third derivative.
  4. For an inequality, state the auxiliary function and its value at the endpoint before differentiating. Examiners award the structure of the argument.
  5. For a root count with a parameter, differentiate, find the critical values, and write the condition as inequalities. Do not attempt to solve the original equation.

Beyond the exam

Where this skill shows up in the job you're competing for — and in life.

Packaging design is a constrained optimisation of exactly…

Packaging design is a constrained optimisation of exactly the kind in this chapter: minimise material for a fixed volume, and the answer explains why a drinks can is close to, but not exactly at, the proportions calculus predicts.

Navigation systems compute a closest point of approach be…

Navigation systems compute a closest point of approach between two moving objects by minimising a squared distance in time, which is the same substitution that keeps the parabola problem quadratic.

Economists locate a profit maximum where marginal revenue…

Economists locate a profit maximum where marginal revenue equals marginal cost, and check the second derivative to be sure the stationary point is a maximum rather than a break-even minimum.

Where else this topic is tested

Prepare once, score in every exam that asks it.

JEE Advanced
JEE Main
BITSAT
ISI Admission Test
CUET (Mathematics)

Questions aspirants ask

Pulled from the Q&A community and mentor sessions.

Because moving along the parabola away from the vertex loses height faster than it gains horizontal distance, once the target point is high enough. Writing the squared distance in terms of gives a quadratic whose minimum sits at , which is only admissible for . Below that threshold the constraint binds and the vertex wins. The threshold is exactly the height of the parabola's centre of curvature at the vertex.

When it gives a non-zero answer, which is most of the time and is quicker than examining signs on both sides. It becomes unreliable exactly where the function is flat to second order, and those are the cases examiners choose. A safe habit is to use it first and fall back on the first derivative test the moment vanishes, rather than treating the zero as a verdict.

Not on its own. Increase is a statement about an interval, and it needs the derivative to keep its sign throughout that interval. Since a derivative need not be continuous, a positive value at one point does not guarantee positive values nearby. In practice the functions on the paper have continuous derivatives, so the implication usually holds, but the correct statement to write is the one about the interval.

Look at whether changes sign, not at whether vanishes. At the origin, and have derivatives that stay non-negative, so there is no extremum, while and have derivatives that change sign and therefore have minima. A stationary point of inflection is a point where the tangent is horizontal and the curve keeps going the same way.

Rarely, once a parameter is present. Solving a cubic in terms of is impractical, whereas its two critical values are found in one differentiation and the condition for three roots is a pair of inequalities. The same shape argument handles transcendental equations such as , where no algebraic route exists at all, by turning the question into how often a horizontal line meets a curve with one turning point.

Sources and How This Chapter Was CheckedSyllabus scope, what was derived rather than quoted, and how every answer here was checked.

Scope follows the JEE Advanced syllabus for 2026 (Mathematics, Application of Derivatives): the derivative as a rate of change, tangents and normals, increasing and decreasing functions, maximum and minimum values of a function, and the geometric interpretation of the derivative.

The treatment concentrates on what Advanced adds to Main. Main asks for a tangent at a given point and for the maximum of a function on an interval; Advanced asks for an optimum whose location changes with a parameter, for a classification when the second derivative test is silent, for an inequality proved by monotonicity, and for the number of roots of an equation containing a parameter.

Results were derived rather than quoted. The nearest-point analysis came from substituting and minimising over ; the orthogonality of the two families from implicit differentiation of each; the inscribed-cylinder volume from eliminating the radius using the sphere's equation; and the root count from the signs of the two critical values.

Every illustration was checked a second way. The nearest-point result was verified at the threshold , where both cases give the same distance; the maximum in Illustration 5 was confirmed to occur twice by comparing all four candidate values; the inscribed cylinder was checked against the two endpoint cases, which both give zero volume; and the cube-root approximation was compared with the true value to five decimal places.

The illustrations are teaching problems written for this chapter, not previous-year questions, and are not labelled as such.

Header Logo