By the end of this chapter you'll be able to…

  • 1Factor a quadratic equation into its two roots using the product-and-sum method
  • 2Verify factored roots using the sum (-b/a) and product (c/a) relationships
  • 3Compare every combination of roots between two equations, not just one pairing
  • 4Correctly conclude x>y, x<y, x=y, x≥y, x≤y, or that the relationship cannot be determined
💡
Why this chapter matters in IBPS Clerk
The banking-exam 'Quantity I vs Quantity II' format is distinctive — solving both equations is only half the question, and checking every combination of roots (not just one) before concluding a relationship is the skill that actually decides accuracy.

Before you start — revise these

🔗
Basic algebraic factoring
Splitting a quadratic into two linear factors is the foundational skill this chapter builds on.

Quadratic Equations — IBPS Clerk / SBI Clerk

Banking-exam quadratic questions follow a distinctive format rarely seen elsewhere: two separate quadratic equations are given, one in and one in , and the question asks for the relationship between and — not simply the roots of either equation alone. Solving both equations correctly is only the first half of the question; comparing every possible pairing of roots is the second, equally important half.

1. Solving a quadratic equation by factoring

Almost every banking-exam quadratic factors cleanly into two integer roots — find two numbers that multiply to the constant term and add to the coefficient of the linear term (with correct signs), then split the equation into two factors. needs two numbers multiplying to and adding to : those are and , giving , so or .

2. Sum and product of roots (a quick verification)

For any quadratic , the sum of the roots equals and the product equals — a fast way to verify factored roots without re-expanding the factored form.

For : sum should be and product should be — and indeed and , confirming the factoring.

3. The Quantity I vs Quantity II format

Once both equations are solved, EVERY root of the first equation must be compared against EVERY root of the second equation — since a variable's "value" is genuinely any one of its roots, not a single fixed number, until every combination is checked. A two-root equation compared against a two-root equation therefore has up to 4 combinations to check, not just 1.

4. Reading the outcome across all combinations

If every combination consistently shows (with at least one combination giving equality and none giving ), the answer is ""; if every combination consistently shows with no equality anywhere, the answer is the strict ""; and if different combinations give conflicting relationships (some , some ), the relationship CANNOT be determined.

Pattern across all combinationsAnswer
Always
Always
Always
or , never
or , never
Mixed — some combinations , others Relationship cannot be determined

5. Why checking only one combination is a common trap

Checking only the "obvious" pairing — say, the larger root of each equation — and stopping there is the single most common error, since the relationship must hold across EVERY combination to be a valid conclusion, not just the one combination that happened to be checked first. A relationship that looks consistent for one pairing can reverse entirely for another, which is exactly why the "cannot be determined" outcome exists as a legitimate answer.

Worked Examples

Example 1. Solve: and . Compare and .

Equation 1 factors as , so or . Equation 2 factors as , so or .

Checking all 4 combinations: ; ; ; . Every combination gives or , never .

Answer: .

Example 2. Solve: and . Compare and .

Equation 1 factors as , so or . Equation 2 factors as , so or .

Checking all 4 combinations: ; ; ; . This mixes and across different combinations.

Answer: Relationship cannot be determined.

Example 3. Solve: and . Compare and .

Equation 1 factors as , giving a single repeated root . Equation 2 factors as , so or .

Checking both combinations: ; . Every combination gives or , never .

Answer: .

Example 4. Verify the roots of using the sum-and-product check.

Factoring: two numbers multiplying to 20 and adding to 9 are 4 and 5, giving , so or . Verification: sum should be (indeed ) and product should be (indeed ).

Answer: or , verified.

Summary

Banking-exam quadratic questions give two separate equations — one in , one in — and ask for the relationship between the variables, not just the roots of either equation alone.

Most banking-exam quadratics factor cleanly: find two numbers multiplying to the constant term and adding to the linear coefficient (with correct signs). The sum-and-product check ( and ) verifies factored roots quickly without re-expanding.

Every root of the first equation must be compared against every root of the second — a two-root-vs-two-root comparison has up to 4 combinations. The relationship is only valid if it holds CONSISTENTLY across every combination; checking just one combination and stopping is the most common error.

If every combination agrees ( throughout, or throughout, or mixed with equality but never the opposite strict inequality), a definite relationship (, , , , or ) can be stated. If combinations genuinely conflict, "relationship cannot be determined" is the correct — and legitimate — answer.

Key formulas & results

Everything to memorise for the exam hall, in one card. Screenshot this for revision.

Sum and product of roots
A fast verification for factored roots without re-expanding.
Comparison rule
Checking only one combination and stopping is the most common error in this topic.
⚠️

Traps IBPS Clerk sets — and how to dodge them

These are the exact option-traps and misreads that cost marks under negative marking.

WATCH OUT
Comparing only one root of each equation and concluding a relationship from that single pairing
Check every combination of roots between the two equations before concluding any relationship.
Why it happens: A relationship that holds for one pairing can reverse for another; only checking all combinations gives a valid conclusion.
WATCH OUT
Assuming a relationship must always be determinable
When different combinations give conflicting relationships (some x>y, some x<y), conclude that the relationship cannot be determined — this is a legitimate, correct answer.
Why it happens: The question format specifically tests whether a consistent relationship exists across all root combinations, and sometimes it genuinely does not.
WATCH OUT
Getting the sign wrong when finding two numbers that multiply to c and add to b
Check the sign of c (the constant term) first: if c is positive, both numbers have the same sign as -b's sign pattern; if c is negative, the numbers have opposite signs.
Why it happens: A sign error in factoring produces roots that don't actually satisfy the original equation, which the sum-and-product check would then catch.

Exam-pattern practice

PYQ-style questions with full solutions. Work through them as a readiness check — mark yourself honestly and get your gap report at the end.

Readiness check

Are you exam-ready for Quadratic Equations?

8 problems from this chapter. Try each one, reveal the worked solution, mark yourself honestly — get your gap report at the end.

8 questions~6 min

5-minute revision

The whole chapter, distilled. Read this the night before the exam.

  • Factor by finding two numbers that multiply to the constant term and add to the linear coefficient, with correct signs.
  • Verify factored roots using Sum = -b/a and Product = c/a.
  • A banking-exam quadratic question compares x (from one equation) against y (from a second equation), never just asks for the roots alone.
  • Check EVERY combination of roots between the two equations before concluding a relationship — a two-root-vs-two-root comparison has up to 4 combinations.
  • If combinations genuinely conflict (some x>y, some x<y), 'relationship cannot be determined' is the correct, legitimate answer.

IBPS Clerk question blueprint

How this topic is asked, tier by tier — so you can prep to the pattern.

Typical weightage: Quadratic Equations contributes an estimated 3-4 of the Numerical Ability section's questions

Question styleMarks eachTypical countWhat it tests
Solving equations3~1Factoring a quadratic equation into its two roots
Comparison — determinate5~1-2Correctly concluding x>y, x<y, x≥y or x≤y across all root combinations
Comparison — cannot be determined6~1Recognising when conflicting combinations mean no relationship can be established
Prep strategy
  • Day 1: factoring drills and the sum-and-product verification check.
  • Day 2: the Quantity I vs Quantity II comparison method, using the extreme-value shortcut.
  • Day 3: mixed timed practice on determinate and 'cannot be determined' comparison outcomes.

Exam-hall strategy

Battle-tested tips from mentors and toppers for this topic under the sectional clock.

  1. Factor both equations completely before attempting any comparison.
  2. Use the extreme-value shortcut (smallest-x vs largest-y, and largest-x vs smallest-y) to check all combinations quickly without listing every pairing.
  3. Never conclude a relationship from a single checked combination — always verify it holds for every combination.
  4. Treat 'cannot be determined' as a normal, expected outcome for a meaningful fraction of these questions, not a sign of an error.

Beyond the exam

Where this skill shows up in the job you're competing for — and in life.

Exhaustive case-checking

The discipline of checking every combination before concluding a relationship transfers directly to any scenario-planning task with multiple possible inputs on each side.

Where else this topic is tested

Prepare once, score in every exam that asks it.

IBPS PO / SBI PO Quantitative AptitudeHigh — the identical Quantity I vs Quantity II format, tested within a broader syllabus
SSC CGL Quantitative AptitudeLow — quadratic equations appear but rarely in this specific comparison format

Questions aspirants ask

Pulled from the Q&A community and mentor sessions.

Roughly 3-4 of the section's 35-40 questions, based on pattern analysis of the exam's topic weightage.

It tests a second skill beyond factoring — systematically checking every possible combination of roots before concluding a relationship, which mirrors careful, exhaustive reasoning rather than a single quick calculation.

Yes — when different combinations of roots give conflicting relationships (some x>y, some x<y), this is the correct and expected answer, not a sign that something was done wrong.

Compare the SMALLEST root of x against the LARGEST root of y, and the LARGEST root of x against the SMALLEST root of y — if these two extreme comparisons agree, every combination in between will also agree; if they disagree, the relationship cannot be determined.
Header Logo