Quadratic Equations — IBPS Clerk / SBI Clerk
Banking-exam quadratic questions follow a distinctive format rarely seen elsewhere: two separate quadratic equations are given, one in and one in , and the question asks for the relationship between and — not simply the roots of either equation alone. Solving both equations correctly is only the first half of the question; comparing every possible pairing of roots is the second, equally important half.
1. Solving a quadratic equation by factoring
Almost every banking-exam quadratic factors cleanly into two integer roots — find two numbers that multiply to the constant term and add to the coefficient of the linear term (with correct signs), then split the equation into two factors. needs two numbers multiplying to and adding to : those are and , giving , so or .
2. Sum and product of roots (a quick verification)
For any quadratic , the sum of the roots equals and the product equals — a fast way to verify factored roots without re-expanding the factored form.
For : sum should be and product should be — and indeed and , confirming the factoring.
3. The Quantity I vs Quantity II format
Once both equations are solved, EVERY root of the first equation must be compared against EVERY root of the second equation — since a variable's "value" is genuinely any one of its roots, not a single fixed number, until every combination is checked. A two-root equation compared against a two-root equation therefore has up to 4 combinations to check, not just 1.
4. Reading the outcome across all combinations
If every combination consistently shows (with at least one combination giving equality and none giving ), the answer is ""; if every combination consistently shows with no equality anywhere, the answer is the strict ""; and if different combinations give conflicting relationships (some , some ), the relationship CANNOT be determined.
| Pattern across all combinations | Answer |
|---|---|
| Always | |
| Always | |
| Always | |
| or , never | |
| or , never | |
| Mixed — some combinations , others | Relationship cannot be determined |
5. Why checking only one combination is a common trap
Checking only the "obvious" pairing — say, the larger root of each equation — and stopping there is the single most common error, since the relationship must hold across EVERY combination to be a valid conclusion, not just the one combination that happened to be checked first. A relationship that looks consistent for one pairing can reverse entirely for another, which is exactly why the "cannot be determined" outcome exists as a legitimate answer.
Worked Examples
Example 1. Solve: and . Compare and .
Equation 1 factors as , so or . Equation 2 factors as , so or .
Checking all 4 combinations: ; ; ; . Every combination gives or , never .
Answer: .
Example 2. Solve: and . Compare and .
Equation 1 factors as , so or . Equation 2 factors as , so or .
Checking all 4 combinations: ; ; ; . This mixes and across different combinations.
Answer: Relationship cannot be determined.
Example 3. Solve: and . Compare and .
Equation 1 factors as , giving a single repeated root . Equation 2 factors as , so or .
Checking both combinations: ; . Every combination gives or , never .
Answer: .
Example 4. Verify the roots of using the sum-and-product check.
Factoring: two numbers multiplying to 20 and adding to 9 are 4 and 5, giving , so or . Verification: sum should be (indeed ) and product should be (indeed ).
Answer: or , verified.
Summary
Banking-exam quadratic questions give two separate equations — one in , one in — and ask for the relationship between the variables, not just the roots of either equation alone.
Most banking-exam quadratics factor cleanly: find two numbers multiplying to the constant term and adding to the linear coefficient (with correct signs). The sum-and-product check ( and ) verifies factored roots quickly without re-expanding.
Every root of the first equation must be compared against every root of the second — a two-root-vs-two-root comparison has up to 4 combinations. The relationship is only valid if it holds CONSISTENTLY across every combination; checking just one combination and stopping is the most common error.
If every combination agrees ( throughout, or throughout, or mixed with equality but never the opposite strict inequality), a definite relationship (, , , , or ) can be stated. If combinations genuinely conflict, "relationship cannot be determined" is the correct — and legitimate — answer.
