By the end of this chapter you'll be able to…

  • 1Draw a free-body diagram for one chosen body and resolve along axes that kill the most terms, or close the force triangle when the forces are concurrent
  • 2Identify a genuine third-law partner with the noun-swap test, and use the same law to conserve total momentum in recoil, explosion and rocket problems
  • 3Decide whether static friction is at its maximum before writing
  • 4Close an under-determined pulley problem by differentiating the string length twice
  • 5Name which real forces are supplying the centripetal resultant, rather than adding a new one
  • 6Solve a lift or accelerating-train problem in both the ground frame and the accelerating frame
💡
Why this chapter matters in JEE Main

This chapter supplies the method the whole of mechanics reuses: choose one body, draw every force on it, add them as vectors. Nearly every wrong answer traces to the drawing step — a force invented, a force forgotten, or a force that actually acts on some other body. Two ideas do most of the damage: third-law pairs act on different bodies so they never cancel, and static friction adjusts itself rather than sitting at its maximum.

Before you start — revise these

🔗
Resolving vectors into perpendicular components
🔗
Kinematics: the constant-acceleration equations
🔗
Trigonometric ratios of standard angles

Laws of Motion

A book rests on a table. Its weight is 10 N and the table pushes up with 10 N. Are these two a Newton's third law pair?

Most say yes. They are not.

A third-law pair always acts on two different bodies. Both of these act on the book, so they can never be a pair — they happen to be equal only because the book is in equilibrium.

The real partner of the book's weight is the book pulling the Earth up with 10 N.

The giveaway: put the book in an accelerating lift. The normal force changes; the weight does not. A third-law pair can never come apart like that.

Everything in this chapter is the same discipline — choose one body, draw every force acting on it, add them as vectors. Nearly every wrong answer is a force drawn that isn't there, one omitted that is, or one that belongs to a different body.

1. First law and inertial frames

First law — a body stays at rest or in uniform motion unless a net external force acts.

This is not a special case of the second law. It defines the frames in which the second law works: a frame where the first law holds is inertial.

Inertia — the property named. Mass — its quantitative measure.

A frame accelerating relative to an inertial one is non-inertial: bodies there appear to accelerate with no force acting. Section 10 handles those.

The Earth is inertial enough for every JEE problem.

2. Second law

Constant mass reduces this to:

The momentum form is the general one. Use it whenever mass changes — rockets, falling chains, conveyor belts.

It is a vector equation, so it holds independently along each axis. Resolve along two perpendicular directions, write two scalar equations.

Choose axes well. On an incline, take axes along and perpendicular to the slope — then the normal force never needs resolving.

Impulse . This is the tool for collisions and jerks, where the force itself is unknown.

Illustration 1

A 150 g ball strikes a wall at and rebounds at , the contact lasting . Find the average force on the wall.

Momentum is a vector, so take the outward direction as positive and the incoming velocity as negative:

The trap is the sign. Using gives 37.5 N, seven times too small. The reversal is most of the momentum change.

Scale check: the ball's own weight is only 1.5 N, so the wall delivers about 175 times its weight — which is why impact forces are treated separately from ordinary ones.

3. Third law

NOT a pair — same body The two real pairs book table W = 10 N N = 10 N Both act ON the book. Equal only because it is in equilibrium. Earth pulls book down (10 N) book pulls Earth up (10 N) table pushes book up (10 N) book pushes table down (10 N) Swap the two nouns. If that does not give the other force, it is not a third-law pair.

Third law — equal and opposite forces, along the same line, acting on different bodies.

The two never appear in the same free-body diagram. That is precisely why they never cancel.

The noun-swap test. "Earth pulls book" pairs with "book pulls Earth". If swapping the two nouns does not produce the other force, it is not a pair.

4. Conservation of linear momentum

Put the third law and the second law together. Internal forces in a system come in equal and opposite pairs, so they cancel in the total:

This is not a new law. It is the third law restated in a form you can compute with.

It is a vector statement, so it holds component by component. Momentum can be conserved horizontally while gravity destroys it vertically — which is exactly the situation in an explosion in flight.

Three standard applications:

SituationBeforeAfter
Recoil of a gun, opposite directions
Explosion at restfragment momenta sum to zero
Rocketmass changesthrust

For the rocket the constant-mass form is simply wrong; you must go back to . Gas leaving at speed relative to the rocket carries away momentum at the rate , and by the third law that rate is the forward thrust.

Illustration 2

A 4 kg rifle fires a 20 g bullet at . Find the recoil speed, and compare the kinetic energies.

No external horizontal force, so total momentum stays zero:

MomentumKinetic energy
Bullet kg m/s J
Rifle kg m/s J

Equal momentum, but 200 times the energy in the bullet. Since , at equal momentum the energy goes as , and the mass ratio is exactly 200. That is why the recoil bruises a shoulder while the bullet penetrates a wall.

Illustration 3

A rocket of total mass 5000 kg burns fuel at , ejecting it at relative to itself. Find the thrust and the initial acceleration. .

The rocket must still support its own weight of N:

Read it back: thrust below means the rocket cannot leave the pad at all, however much fuel it carries. And as fuel burns off, falls while the thrust holds steady, so the acceleration rises throughout the burn.

5. The common forces

ForceRuleWatch out
Weight, toward the Earth's centreAlways present
NormalContact push, to surfaceEquals only on a horizontal surface with no vertical acceleration and no other vertical force
TensionAlong the string, pulls onlySame throughout an ideal massless string; an ideal pulley turns its direction, not its size
Spring, restoringCannot change instantly — that would need an instant length change

"Just after release" questions turn on the last row. A string's tension can vanish instantly; a spring's force cannot change at all in that instant.

Illustration 4

Block A hangs from a spring fixed to the ceiling; block B, of the same mass , hangs from A by a string. The string is cut. Find the acceleration of each block immediately afterwards.

Before the cut, the whole system is in equilibrium, so the spring carries both weights:

Immediately after, apply the rule in the table above.

Block B — the string is gone, so only gravity acts, giving downward.

Block A — the spring's length has not had time to change, so it still pulls up with , while A's own weight pulls down:

The two blocks fly apart with equal accelerations in opposite directions. Assuming the spring force drops to instantly gives , and that is the standard wrong answer.

6. Equilibrium of concurrent forces

Concurrent forces all pass through a single point, so they produce no torque about it and only the force condition is needed:

Drawn head to tail, forces in equilibrium form a closed polygon — three of them close into a triangle.

Lami's theorem turns that triangle into a formula. For exactly three concurrent forces in equilibrium:

where each angle is the one between the other two forces. It is the sine rule applied to the closed triangle, and the three angles must sum to — a free check on your diagram before you compute anything.

10 kg T₁ T₂ mg 30° 60° angles at the knot sum to 360° Three concurrent forces in equilibrium close into a triangle — which is all Lami's theorem says.

Illustration 5

A 10 kg load hangs from a knot held by two ceiling strings, one at and the other at to the horizontal. Find both tensions. .

By components. Horizontal: , so .

Vertical:

By Lami's theorem. The two strings are apart; is from the vertical, so the angle between and is , and between and it is . Those three sum to , as they must.

,

Two independent routes, same answer. Note that the steeper string carries the larger tension.

7. Friction

Static friction adjusts itself — it takes whatever value prevents sliding, up to the limit. It is usually below maximum.

Trap. Never write unless the body is on the verge of sliding. This is the most common friction error.

Typically , which is why a stationary object is harder to start than to keep moving.

Rolling friction is a third and much smaller resistance, arising from the slight deformation of the wheel and surface at the contact. It is typically one to two orders of magnitude below sliding friction — which is the entire reason wheels exist, and why a loaded trolley is easy to push but hard to drag.

applied force f μ_s N μ_k N slipping begins static: f equals the applied force kinetic: f fixed at μ_k N, whatever you apply Static friction is a range, not a value. Only at the peak does f equal μ_s N.

Angle of repose — the incline angle at which sliding just begins:

From balancing against . The mass cancels: the angle depends only on the surfaces.

Friction does not always oppose motion. The friction driving a car acts forward on the wheels — it opposes the relative slipping of tyre on road, not the car's motion.

Illustration 6

At what angle should a block be pulled so that the least force is needed to just start it sliding? Take .

Pull at angle above the horizontal. The vertical component lightens the block, so the normal force is not :

On the verge of sliding, :

is least when the denominator is greatest. Differentiating, :

With : and .

Compare: pulling horizontally would need . Angling the pull saves 20% of the effort — you are trading a little forward force for a large reduction in the normal force. The optimum angle is the angle of friction itself.

8. Constraints and connected bodies

Constraints supply the equations that close an under-determined system.

Single fixed pulley — inextensible string if one block descends , the other rises equal acceleration magnitudes.

Movable pulley — supported by two segments its displacement is half the sum of the string ends' accelerations in a ratio.

General method, never fails: write the total string length as a sum of segments, set , differentiate again. Safer than guessing the ratio.

For bodies in contact, the contact force is one unknown appearing in both diagrams with opposite signs — the third law doing useful work.

Illustration 7

3 kg and 5 kg hang over a frictionless pulley. . Find and .

Constraint: same , opposite directions.

5 kg block: 3 kg block:

Add, and cancels:

Then .

Check: lies between 30 N and 50 N, as it must — the heavy side falls, the light side rises.

Illustration 8

A rope runs from a load, up over a fixed pulley, down under a movable pulley and back up to a fixed point. The free end is pulled with acceleration . Find the load's acceleration.

Guessing the ratio is where marks are lost. Use the length method instead.

Let be the depth of the movable pulley below the fixed one and the length of free rope pulled in. Two rope segments span the gap, so

The rope is inextensible, so , and differentiating twice:

Read it back: the load moves half as far and half as fast, so the rope tension is half the load's — a movable pulley halves the force at the cost of doubling the distance. The energy bookkeeping is untouched, which is the sanity check on any pulley ratio.

9. Circular motion dynamics

θ mg N N cos θ = mg N sin θ = mv²/r banked road, frictionless

Centripetal force is not a new force. It is the name for whatever real forces — tension, friction, gravity, normal — add up to point inward.

Flat road: friction supplies it.

Banked, frictionless: the horizontal component of supplies it. Dividing the two equations in the figure:

The mass cancels — the design speed of a banked curve is the same for a truck and a motorcycle.

Vertical circle: at the top, gravity alone can be the whole centripetal force, so the minimum speed there is . Below that the string goes slack.

Conical pendulum: a bob swung in a horizontal circle on a string at angle to the vertical is the banked-road equations with replaced by — the same two components, the same .

Illustration 9

A bob on a string moves in a horizontal circle with the string at to the vertical. Find the speed and the period. .

The bob has no vertical acceleration, so the vertical components balance while the horizontal component turns it:

Dividing, , with :

Period

Check by the standard form: . The two routes agree.

Note: the string can never reach the horizontal. would need infinite tension at .

Illustration 10

A car of mass 1000 kg rounds a curve of radius 50 m on a flat road, , . Find the maximum safe speed. Does it change for a 2000 kg truck?

Mass does not appear. Same for the truck — the required force and the available friction both scale with , so it cancels.

10. Pseudo forces

In a frame accelerating at , the second law still works if every body gets an extra force:

Opposite to the frame's acceleration, proportional to the body's mass.

It has no third-law partner. That is the formal sign it is bookkeeping, not physics.

Lift: accelerating up at gives apparent weight . In free fall it is zero — that is what weightlessness means.

Working in a non-inertial frame is a choice. Any problem can be done from the ground. Switch only when it makes a body stationary.

Illustration 11

A 2 kg block sits on the floor of a lift. . Find the normal force when the lift accelerates (a) up at 2 m/s², (b) down at 2 m/s², (c) in free fall.

Ground frame, up positive:

(a) (b) (c) — the block floats.

In the lift's frame the same answers come from adding and setting the block in equilibrium. Different interpretation, identical prediction — always.

Summary

  • Choose the body, draw every force on it, add as vectors. That is the whole method.
  • The first law defines inertial frames; it is not a special case of the second.
  • is the general law. only for constant mass.
  • Third-law pairs act on different bodies, so they never appear in one FBD and never cancel. Use the noun-swap test.
  • Zero external force conserves total momentum, component by component. Recoil, explosions and rockets are the three standard cases.
  • Rocket thrust , and the acceleration rises as fuel burns off.
  • Three concurrent forces in equilibrium close into a triangle — that is all Lami's theorem says.
  • only on a horizontal surface with no vertical acceleration.
  • A string's tension can change instantly; a spring's force cannot.
  • — static friction is usually below maximum. Never assume equality without checking.
  • , independent of mass.
  • Rolling friction is one to two orders below sliding friction. That is why wheels exist.
  • Least force to start a block sliding is at , giving .
  • Constraints: write the string length, differentiate twice. Movable pulley gives .
  • Centripetal force names whatever real forces point inward. Banked: , mass cancels. Vertical circle needs at the top.
  • Pseudo force in a non-inertial frame. No third-law partner.

Key formulas & results

Everything to memorise for the exam hall, in one card. Screenshot this for revision.

Second law
The momentum form is the general one — use it whenever the mass changes (rockets, falling chains). It is a vector equation, so it holds separately along each axis.
Impulse
The tool for collisions and jerks, where the force itself is unknown but its effect is not.
Third law
The two act on **different** bodies, so they never appear in one free-body diagram and never cancel. Noun-swap test: "Earth pulls book" pairs with "book pulls Earth". Weight and normal force on a resting book are *not* a pair.
Friction
Static friction takes whatever value prevents sliding, up to the limit — it is usually **below** maximum, so never write $f=\mu_s N$ unless the body is on the verge of moving. Typically $\mu_k<\mu_s$.
Angle of repose
From balancing $mg\sin\theta$ against $\mu_s mg\cos\theta$. The mass cancels — the angle depends only on the pair of surfaces.
Normal force and apparent weight
$N=mg$ **only** on a horizontal surface with no vertical acceleration and no other vertical force. Lift accelerating up: $m(g+a)$. Free fall: zero, which is what weightlessness means.
Circular motion
Centripetal force is a *name* for whichever real forces point inward, not a new force. Flat road: $v_{max}=\sqrt{\mu rg}$. Banked with friction: $v_{max}=\sqrt{rg\dfrac{\mu+\tan\theta}{1-\mu\tan\theta}}$. Vertical circle needs $\sqrt{gr}$ at the top. Mass cancels throughout.
Pseudo force
Added to every body when working in a frame accelerating at $\vec{a}_0$. It has no third-law partner, which marks it as bookkeeping. Using it is always optional — the ground frame gives the same prediction.
Conservation of linear momentum
The third law restated so you can compute with it — internal forces cancel in pairs. It is a **vector** statement, so it can hold horizontally while gravity destroys it vertically. Recoil: $m_bv_b=m_gv_g$, and since $K=p^{2}/2m$ the light body carries far more energy at equal momentum.
Rocket thrust (variable mass)
Here $F=ma$ is simply wrong; go back to $\vec{F}=d\vec{p}/dt$. Thrust below $mg$ means the rocket never leaves the pad. As fuel burns off $m$ falls while thrust holds steady, so the acceleration **rises** through the burn.
Lami's theorem
For exactly **three concurrent forces in equilibrium**, each angle being the one *between the other two*. It is the sine rule on the closed force triangle. The three angles must sum to $360°$ — check that before computing anything.
Least force to start a block sliding
Pulling at an angle lightens the block, so $N=mg-F\sin\theta$ and the optimum pull is at the **angle of friction** itself. At $\mu=0.75$ it saves 20% over a horizontal pull.
Conical pendulum
The banked-road equations with the normal force replaced by the string tension — $T\cos\theta=mg$ and $T\sin\theta=mv^{2}/r$, with $r=L\sin\theta$. The string can never reach the horizontal, since $\theta=90°$ would need infinite tension.
⚠️

Traps JEE Main sets — and how to dodge them

These are the exact option-traps and misreads that cost marks under negative marking.

WATCH OUT
Calling the weight and the normal force on a resting book a third-law pair
They act on the same body, so they cannot be a pair — they are equal only because the book is in equilibrium. The partner of the weight is the book's pull on the Earth.
Why it happens: They are equal and opposite, which is the whole of how the third law gets remembered.
WATCH OUT
Writing whenever friction is static
is the maximum. Compare the applied force with it first: if the applied force is smaller, friction exactly equals the applied force and the body stays put.
Why it happens: The formula is memorised as an equality, and the inequality sign gets lost.
WATCH OUT
Assuming the normal force equals
Only on a horizontal surface with no vertical acceleration and nothing else pulling or pushing vertically. On an incline it is ; in a lift it is ; with an applied force at an angle it changes again.
Why it happens: The first hundred problems a student sees are all flat, static and unloaded.
WATCH OUT
Adding centripetal force to a free-body diagram as if it were a separate force
It is not a force. Draw only the real forces — tension, gravity, normal, friction — then set their inward resultant equal to .
Why it happens: It is named like a force and has its own formula, so it looks like one.
WATCH OUT
Guessing the acceleration ratio for a movable pulley
Write the total string length as a sum of segments, set its time derivative to zero, and differentiate again. The ratio then falls out instead of being assumed.
Why it happens: The single fixed pulley gives , and that generalises incorrectly.
WATCH OUT
Treating a spring's force as able to change instantly when a support is cut
A spring's force cannot change in an instant, because that would require an instant change in length. A string's tension can vanish immediately. This decides every "just after release" question.
Why it happens: Strings and springs both look like connectors, so they get treated the same way.

Exam-pattern practice

PYQ-style questions with full solutions. Work through them as a readiness check — mark yourself honestly and get your gap report at the end.

Readiness check

Are you exam-ready for Laws of Motion?

12 problems from this chapter. Try each one, reveal the worked solution, mark yourself honestly — get your gap report at the end.

12 questions~8 min worth ~8 marks in JEE Main exams

5-minute revision

The whole chapter, distilled. Read this the night before the exam.

  • Choose the body, draw every force on it, add as vectors. That is the entire method.
  • The first law defines inertial frames; it is not a special case of the second.
  • is general; needs constant mass.
  • Third-law pairs act on different bodies, never appear in one FBD, never cancel. Use the noun-swap test.
  • only on a horizontal surface with no vertical acceleration.
  • A string's tension can change instantly; a spring's force cannot.
  • — compare the applied force with the maximum before assuming equality.
  • , independent of mass.
  • Constraints: write the string length, differentiate twice. Movable pulley gives .
  • Centripetal force names the inward resultant of real forces. Banked: . Vertical circle: at the top. Pseudo force has no partner.
  • Zero external force conserves total momentum component by component. Recoil, explosion and rocket are the three standard cases; rocket thrust .
  • Lami's theorem is the sine rule on the closed force triangle — three concurrent forces only, and the three angles at the point must sum to .

JEE Main question blueprint

How this topic is asked, tier by tier — so you can prep to the pattern.

Typical weightage: ~2 questions (8 marks) of the 100-mark Physics section

Question styleMarks eachTypical countWhat it tests
Newton's laws, frames and free-body diagrams41Third-law pairs, apparent weight in a lift, pseudo forces and accelerating frames
Friction41Static versus kinetic, the angle of repose, and blocks on inclines with an applied force
Connected bodies and constraints41Pulley systems, string constraints, movable pulleys, and contact forces between blocks
Circular motion dynamics41Flat and banked roads with and without friction, and the vertical circle
Prep strategy
  • Practise drawing free-body diagrams alone, without solving, until no force is ever missed or invented. That skill carries the whole of mechanics.
  • Do the string-length differentiation for a movable pulley by hand once. After that the $2:1$ ratio is a result you own rather than one you recall.
  • Solve two or three problems in both the ground frame and an accelerating frame to confirm they agree, which builds the confidence to pick whichever is easier.

Exam-hall strategy

Battle-tested tips from mentors and toppers for this topic under the sectional clock.

  1. Draw the free-body diagram before writing a single equation, and draw it for one body at a time. Most lost marks are drawing errors, not algebra errors.
  2. On an incline, take axes along and perpendicular to the slope. The normal force then needs no resolving and one equation becomes trivial.
  3. For friction, always compare the applied force with first. Decide whether the body moves, and only then choose between and .
  4. For connected bodies, write the constraint equation explicitly before solving. It is the equation that makes the system determinate.
  5. In circular motion, list the real forces and ask which of them point inward. Never add a centripetal arrow to the diagram.

Beyond the exam

Where this skill shows up in the job you're competing for — and in life.

Banked corners on highways and racetracks are designed fr…

Banked corners on highways and racetracks are designed from , which is why the design speed is posted rather than left to the driver.

Seat belts and airbags are impulse devices: they cannot c…

Seat belts and airbags are impulse devices: they cannot change in a crash, so they stretch the collision time instead, which reduces the peak force.

Anti-lock braking exists entirely because

Anti-lock braking exists entirely because — a wheel that is rolling keeps static friction, while a locked skidding wheel drops to the smaller kinetic value.

Where else this topic is tested

Prepare once, score in every exam that asks it.

JEE Main
JEE Advanced
NEET UG
CBSE Class 11 Boards
BITSAT

Questions aspirants ask

Pulled from the Q&A community and mentor sessions.

Because the two never act on the same body. When you push a trolley, you push it forward and it pushes you backward with the same size force — but the forward force acts on the trolley and the backward force acts on you. To find the trolley's acceleration you add only the forces acting on the trolley, and the reaction is not among them. Forces cancel only when they act on the same object, and a third-law pair by definition never does.

Assume the body is not moving, work out what friction would be needed to hold it, then compare that with the maximum available. If the required value is smaller, friction supplies exactly that and your assumption was right. If it is larger, the body slides and you switch to kinetic friction. Never start by writing the limiting value — that is only correct at the single instant of impending motion, and questions are frequently set just below it precisely to catch that.

No. It is a job description, not a force. Something must supply a net inward force of to keep a body on a circular path, and depending on the situation that something is tension in a string, friction from a road, gravity from a planet, or a component of a normal force. When you draw a free-body diagram, draw only those real forces; then write their inward resultant equal to . Adding a separate arrow labelled centripetal force double-counts and is the most common error in the topic.

They are not real in the sense that matters most: they have no source object and no third-law partner. They are a correction term that lets you keep using inside an accelerating frame. And yes, you can always avoid them — every problem can be solved from the ground. It is worth switching only when the accelerating frame makes some body stationary, since equilibrium equations are easier than acceleration equations. The two routes always give the same prediction; only the story differs.

Because both sides of the equation are proportional to it. On a banked road the required centripetal force is and the available horizontal component of is proportional to , so divides out and the design speed is the same for every vehicle. The same thing happens with the angle of repose and with maximum speed on a flat road. When it does not cancel, that is worth noticing: it usually means a force in the problem is independent of mass, such as an applied push or air resistance.

Sources and How This Chapter Was CheckedSyllabus scope, what was derived rather than quoted, and how every answer here was checked.

Scope follows the NTA JEE Main syllabus for 2026 (Unit 3, Laws of Motion), covering the three laws, momentum and impulse, the conservation of linear momentum and its applications, the equilibrium of concurrent forces, static, kinetic and rolling friction, and the dynamics of uniform circular motion including a vehicle on a level and on a banked road.

Results were derived rather than quoted: the angle of repose by balancing against ; the banking angle by dividing the vertical and horizontal component equations for ; the maximum speed on a flat road from ; and the pulley acceleration by adding the two block equations so the tension cancels.

Every illustration was computed and checked against a second route or a physical bound. The pulley tension was confirmed to lie between the two weights, and the banked-road and flat-road results confirmed to be mass-independent.

The two-string tensions were obtained by components and again by Lami's theorem, the conical pendulum by dividing the component equations and again from the standard period formula, and the lift problem in both the ground frame and the accelerating frame. The illustrations are teaching problems written for this chapter, not previous-year questions, and are not labelled as such.

Header Logo