By the end of this chapter you'll be able to…

  • 1Verify share capital and reserve movements against constitutional documents and statutory requirements
  • 2Verify PPE existence, ownership, valuation and completeness, and distinguish capital from revenue expenditure
  • 3Apply SA 501's physical inventory attendance requirement and distinguish it from valuation testing
  • 4Test inventory cutoff and explain its connection to sales cutoff as the same error viewed from two sides
  • 5Distinguish positive from negative receivables confirmation and state when each is appropriate
  • 6Apply revenue cutoff testing and analytical procedures to identify unusual patterns
  • 7Perform a search for unrecorded liabilities and explain why completeness is the primary concern for payables
  • 8Evaluate a provision against AS 29's recognition criteria
  • 9Verify cash and bank balances through confirmation, reconciliation review and physical count
  • 10Verify investment existence and valuation, distinguishing current from long-term treatment
💡
Why this chapter matters in CMA Intermediate
Risk assessment, materiality, evidence and assertions are all abstractions until they meet actual numbers on a trial balance, and this chapter is where that meeting happens. Every item is organised the same way — identify the assertion most at risk, let the assertion determine the procedure — which is exactly the discipline the evidence and sampling chapter built and now applies systematically across share capital, PPE, inventory, receivables, revenue, liabilities, cash and investments. A candidate who lists everything they remember about a balance without organising it by assertion is demonstrating recall, not the structured thinking this paper actually rewards.

Audit of Items of Financial Statements

Weightage: Chapter 5 of ICAI's Paper 5 syllabus, roughly 14 marks — the largest single block in the paper and the most practical, converting every earlier chapter's abstractions into concrete procedures on real balances.

Why this chapter is where the paper becomes usable

Risk assessment, materiality, evidence and assertions are all, on their own, abstractions. This chapter is where they meet actual numbers on a trial balance. Every item covered below is organised the same way: identify the assertion most at risk for that item, and let the assertion tell you what procedure addresses it — exactly the discipline built in the previous chapter, now applied item by item.

Share capital and reserves

Verify the authorised, issued, subscribed and paid-up capital against the Memorandum and Articles of Association and board/shareholder resolutions authorising any changes during the year. Confirm compliance with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 governing allotment, further issue, buyback (each developed fully in Paper 2). Verify movements in reserves — transfers, utilisation (particularly restrictions on the use of Securities Premium and Capital Redemption Reserve) — against board minutes and statutory requirements. The primary assertions at risk are existence/occurrence (was this share capital movement genuinely authorised and did it occur as recorded) and presentation (is it correctly classified and disclosed under Schedule III).

Property, plant and equipment

Verify existence through physical verification (inspection), directly addressing the existence assertion — the single most emphasised procedure for this item, because PPE misstatement risk concentrates heavily here.

Verify ownership/rights through title deeds, registration certificates, purchase invoices — addressing rights and obligations.

Verify valuation — cost includes purchase price and directly attributable costs (Paper 1's AS 10 material, examined here from the audit side); depreciation is computed on a consistent basis, using an appropriate method and rate; addressing accuracy, valuation and allocation.

Verify completeness of the register — a fixed asset register reconciled to the general ledger, and additions/disposals during the year vouched to supporting documentation, addressing completeness.

Capital versus revenue expenditure — verify that repairs and maintenance genuinely restoring or maintaining an asset (revenue expenditure) have not been capitalised, and that genuine improvements/additions (capital expenditure) have not been expensed — a classification risk that misstates both the balance sheet and the profit and loss account simultaneously if got wrong.

Inventory

Attend the physical inventory count — SA 501 requires the auditor to attend physical inventory counting, unless impracticable, to evaluate management's instructions and procedures, observe the performance of the count, inspect the inventory, and perform test counts — this is observation applied to the existence and completeness assertions directly.

Verify valuation — inventory is valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value (Foundation-level AS 2, examined here from the audit perspective): verify the costing methodology (FIFO, weighted average), test the computation of cost, and specifically test for items where net realisable value has fallen below cost (obsolete, slow-moving, or damaged stock) — addressing accuracy, valuation and allocation.

Cutoff — verify that goods received before year end are included in both inventory and payables, and goods dispatched before year end are excluded from inventory and included in sales, addressing the cutoff assertion specifically — this is a frequently tested point because inventory cutoff errors and sales cutoff errors are often the same underlying error viewed from two sides.

Where the auditor cannot attend the count (for instance, appointed after year end), alternative procedures such as attending a later count and rolling back/forward, or relying on well-documented perpetual inventory records, may provide sufficient appropriate evidence instead.

Receivables (trade receivables)

External confirmation (positive or negative) is a primary procedure, directly addressing existence — a positive confirmation requires the recipient to respond in every case; a negative confirmation requires a response only if the recipient disagrees with the stated amount, and is used where control risk is lower and the population is more homogeneous, since a lack of response is itself (weakly) interpreted as agreement.

Verify valuation through review of ageing, assessment of the adequacy of the provision for doubtful debts, and testing subsequent cash receipts (a strong form of evidence, since actual post-year-end cash collection is direct confirmation the receivable was genuine and collectible) — addressing accuracy, valuation and allocation.

Verify cutoff — sales recorded before year end genuinely relate to goods/services delivered before year end.

Revenue

Recognition criteria — verify revenue is recognised in accordance with the applicable standard (AS 9's transfer of significant risks and rewards, or equivalent), not merely on invoicing.

Cutoff testing is the most emphasised procedure here, directly connecting to inventory and receivables cutoff above — a sale recorded in the wrong period misstates revenue, receivables/inventory, and profit simultaneously.

Analytical procedures — comparing revenue trends against prior periods, budgets, and non-financial data (units sold, capacity utilisation) to identify unusual patterns warranting further investigation — directly connects to the risk-assessment-stage analytical procedures already covered, now applied at the substantive testing stage.

Liabilities — trade payables and provisions

Search for unrecorded liabilities is the primary procedure for payables, directly addressing completeness — examining payments made after year end to identify obligations that existed at the balance sheet date but were not yet recorded, precisely the technique developed in the evidence chapter's discussion of why completeness, not existence, is the primary concern for liability balances.

Provisions — verify recognition criteria are met (AS 29's present obligation, probable outflow, reliable estimate — Paper 1 material examined here from the audit side), and evaluate the reasonableness of the estimate against historical experience and available evidence.

Cash and bank balances

Bank confirmation, obtained directly from the bank, addressing existence and rights and obligations with high reliability (external, direct, documentary — the reliability hierarchy from the previous chapter applied).

Bank reconciliation statement review — verify reconciling items are genuine and are subsequently cleared, since unexplained or old, unreconciled items can indicate error or concealment.

Cash count, where physical cash balances are material, addressing existence directly through inspection.

Investments

Verify existence and ownership through physical inspection of share certificates (or confirmation from a depository for dematerialised holdings) and title documents.

Verify valuation — current investments at the lower of cost and fair value; long-term investments at cost, less provision for any decline that is other than temporary (Foundation-level AS 13 material, examined here from the audit perspective) — addressing accuracy, valuation and allocation.

The unifying discipline

Every item above follows the same pattern the previous chapter established: name the assertion, then let the assertion determine the procedure. A candidate answering a question on "what would you verify regarding a company's fixed assets" who simply lists everything they can remember about PPE, without organising the answer around which assertion each check addresses, is demonstrating recall without demonstrating the structured, assertion-driven thinking this whole paper is actually testing — and the difference in marks between the two kinds of answer is exactly the difference the method chapter's opening point about vocabulary and structure describes.

Key formulas & results

Everything to memorise for the exam hall, in one card. Screenshot this for revision.

PPE: existence via inspection, ownership via title documents, valuation via cost + depreciation consistency, completeness via register reconciliation
Inventory: SA 501 attendance at the count for existence/completeness, valuation at lower of cost and NRV, cutoff on both goods received and dispatched
Receivables: external confirmation (positive/negative) for existence, ageing/provision review and subsequent receipts for valuation
Revenue: recognition criteria + cutoff testing (the same error as inventory/receivables cutoff, viewed from the revenue side) + analytical procedures
Payables: search for unrecorded liabilities (post-year-end payments) is the primary completeness procedure
Cash/bank: bank confirmation for existence/rights, reconciliation review, physical count where material
Investments: physical inspection/depository confirmation for existence, cost vs lower-of-cost-and-fair-value (current) or cost less other-than-temporary decline (long-term) for valuation
⚠️

Traps CMA Intermediate sets — and how to dodge them

These are the exact option-traps and misreads that cost marks under negative marking.

WATCH OUT
Listing procedures for a balance without organising them by which assertion each addresses
WATCH OUT
Treating attendance at the physical inventory count as sufficient evidence of valuation, when it addresses existence/completeness, not valuation
WATCH OUT
Using a positive confirmation where a negative one would be appropriate, or the reverse, without considering control risk and population homogeneity
WATCH OUT
Testing only inventory cutoff or only revenue cutoff without recognising they are frequently the same underlying error
WATCH OUT
Capitalising revenue expenditure (repairs) or expensing capital expenditure (improvements), misstating both the balance sheet and P&L
WATCH OUT
Focusing payables testing on existence rather than completeness, the opposite of where liability risk is actually concentrated
WATCH OUT
Accepting a provision without testing it against AS 29's three conditions — present obligation, probable outflow, reliable estimate
WATCH OUT
Treating subsequent cash receipts as irrelevant to receivables valuation, when they are strong direct evidence of collectibility

Exam-pattern practice

PYQ-style questions with full solutions. Work through them as a readiness check — mark yourself honestly and get your gap report at the end.

Readiness check

Are you exam-ready for Audit of Items of Financial Statements?

15 problems from this chapter. Try each one, reveal the worked solution, mark yourself honestly — get your gap report at the end.

15 questions~11 min

5-minute revision

The whole chapter, distilled. Read this the night before the exam.

  • Every item follows the same discipline: name the assertion at risk, let the assertion determine the procedure
  • PPE: existence via physical inspection, ownership via title documents, valuation via cost + consistent depreciation, completeness via register reconciliation
  • PPE: capital versus revenue expenditure misclassification distorts both the balance sheet and P&L simultaneously
  • SA 501: attend the physical inventory count (existence/completeness), test valuation separately (lower of cost and NRV)
  • Inventory and revenue cutoff are frequently the same underlying error viewed from opposite sides — test together
  • Positive confirmation always needs a response; negative confirmation needs one only on disagreement, and needs lower risk + homogeneous population
  • Subsequent cash receipts are strong direct evidence of receivables' collectibility
  • Search for unrecorded liabilities (examining post-year-end payments) is the primary completeness procedure for payables
  • Completeness is the primary concern for liabilities (understatement incentive); existence is primary for assets (overstatement incentive)
  • Provisions tested against AS 29's three conditions: present obligation, probable outflow, reliable estimate
  • Bank confirmation is highly reliable: independent, direct, documentary — and covers more than just the balance (other accounts, loans, guarantees)
  • Current investments: lower of cost and fair value (any decline recognised); long-term: cost less provision for other-than-temporary decline only
  • Misclassifying current vs long-term investment status changes which valuation rule applies and can misstate carrying value on its own

CMA Intermediate question blueprint

How this topic is asked, tier by tier — so you can prep to the pattern.

Typical weightage: 14

Exam-hall strategy

Battle-tested tips from mentors and toppers for this topic under the sectional clock.

  1. For any balance sheet item question, structure the answer explicitly by assertion, naming the assertion before the procedure for each point
  2. Distinguish attendance at the inventory count (existence/completeness) from valuation testing explicitly, since they are commonly conflated
  3. In cutoff questions, check whether the fact pattern involves a connected inventory-and-revenue error and address both sides
  4. State the specific condition (lower risk, homogeneous population) before recommending negative over positive confirmation
  5. For liability balances, lead with completeness rather than existence, and name the search for unrecorded liabilities explicitly
  6. Cite the relevant accounting standard (AS 2, AS 9, AS 10, AS 13, AS 29) by name when discussing what a balance should be measured against
  7. For investments, state the classification (current or long-term) before applying a valuation rule, since the classification determines which rule applies

Beyond the exam

Where this skill shows up in the job you're competing for — and in life.

Physical inventory count attendance is one of the most vi…

Physical inventory count attendance is one of the most visible, hands-on parts of real audit fieldwork, often involving auditors travelling to warehouses and production sites at year end

The search for unrecorded liabilities is a standard

The search for unrecorded liabilities is a standard, almost universal year-end audit procedure performed on every audit with a material payables balance

Bank confirmations are sent as a matter of course on near…

Bank confirmations are sent as a matter of course on nearly every audit engagement and are among the first pieces of external evidence an audit team requests

Cutoff testing around the year-end date is one of the mos…

Cutoff testing around the year-end date is one of the most time-pressured and carefully planned procedures in real audit fieldwork, since it must be performed at exactly the right moment

Where else this topic is tested

Prepare once, score in every exam that asks it.

CA Final Paper 3 — Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics, where these procedures extend to more complex group and specialised entity audits
CS Executive — Secretarial Audit, Compliance Management and Due Diligence
CMA Intermediate — Cost and Management Audit
ACCA Audit and Assurance, where substantive procedures for specific financial statement items are examined in near-identical terms

Questions aspirants ask

Pulled from the Q&A community and mentor sessions.

The shorter, more reliable path is exactly the discipline this chapter is built around: for any item, ask which assertion is genuinely at risk given the specific facts, and then reason towards a procedure that would provide evidence about that specific assertion, rather than memorising a fixed checklist per item. A candidate who has internalised what each assertion means, and which kind of procedure (inspection, confirmation, recalculation, and so on) naturally addresses which kind of assertion, can construct a sensible answer for a balance sheet item never explicitly covered in the syllabus, simply by applying the same reasoning this chapter demonstrates repeatedly across share capital, PPE, inventory, receivables, revenue, liabilities, cash and investments.

Because existence is a foundational, gateway assertion for inventory in a specific way that makes it disproportionately important: there is no meaningful way to test the valuation of inventory that does not actually exist, so confirming existence and completeness through the physical count is a necessary precondition before valuation testing on the confirmed quantities can proceed sensibly. It is also a procedure the auditor genuinely cannot perform after the fact in the same way for many other items; unlike a document that can be inspected at any later date, a physical inventory count is a point-in-time event, and if the auditor is not present when it happens, that specific opportunity to directly observe existence is gone, which is precisely why SA 501 makes attendance, where practicable, a required procedure rather than merely a recommended one.

You need to know the substance of what each standard requires well enough to assess whether a client has applied it correctly, since that assessment is exactly what the audit procedures in this chapter are testing for; but the emphasis in this paper is on the audit procedure itself, what evidence to gather and how, rather than on computing the accounting figures from scratch the way Paper 1 requires. A useful way to hold the two together is that Paper 1 teaches you to compute the correct figure, and this chapter teaches you how, as an auditor, to gather evidence confirming that the figure the client has already computed is indeed correct under that same standard.
Header Logo