By the end of this chapter you'll be able to…

  • 1Name the seven SI base units and what each is now pinned to
  • 2Count significant figures, and know why changing units never changes them
  • 3Use the right rule: significant figures for ×÷, decimal places for +−
  • 4Find the uncertainty in a result — percentage errors add for a product
  • 5Write any dimensional formula, and test an equation for homogeneity
  • 6Derive a relation by dimensional analysis, and say what it cannot give you
💡
Why this chapter matters
Every number you write for the rest of physics depends on this chapter. Since 2018 the SI units are pinned to constants of nature rather than objects — the kilogram no longer lives in a vault in Paris. And dimensional analysis will kill a wrong formula in fifteen seconds, though it can only ever prove one wrong, never right.

Units and Measurements

1. What This Chapter Covers

NCERT Physics Part I, Chapter 1 (Reprint 2026-27) has six sections. Note section 1.3.3 — it is where uncertainty now lives.

Textbook sectionTopicWhat it answers
1.1IntroductionWhy physics needs an agreed system of units
1.2The International System of UnitsWhat SI is, and how its base units are fixed today
1.3Significant figuresHow many digits of a measurement you can trust
1.3.3Uncertainty in a resultHow error carries through a calculation
1.4Dimensions of physical quantitiesWhat a quantity's "dimensions" mean
1.5Dimensional formulae and equationsHow to write them down
1.6Dimensional analysisWhat the method can and cannot do

What changed — and what did NOT

The old standalone "Errors in measurement" section is gone. Uncertainty is not. It survives as section 1.3.3, folded inside significant figures — and the CBSE 2026-27 syllabus lists it explicitly:

"significant figures, Determining the uncertainty in result. Dimensions of physical quantities, dimensional analysis and its applications." — CBSE Class XI Physics (Code 042), Unit I, session 2026-27

TopicStatus in the 2026-27 chapter
Uncertainty in a calculated resultIn — textbook section 1.3.3, and examinable
Relative error, and the ± notationIn — worked in textbook section 1.3.3
Combination-of-errors rule for a productIn — worked in textbook section 1.3.3
Systematic / random / gross error classificationNot in this chapter
The terms "absolute error", "percentage error"Not used
Measuring instruments as a taught sectionRemoved from the body
Vernier callipers, screw gaugeOnly in Exercises 1.6 and 1.8 — never taught

Two traps follow from this table.

  1. Notes that tell you error analysis is off-syllabus are wrong — CBSE lists it as examinable. Section 6 below teaches section 1.3.3 in full.
  2. Notes that drill you on systematic vs random errors are teaching an older edition. That classification is genuinely absent here.

Exercises 1.6 and 1.8 assume instruments the chapter never explains. Section 8 covers them.


2. Units and the SI System (Textbook 1.1 to 1.2)

Why units exist at all

A measurement is a comparison against an agreed standard. "The length is 5" means nothing until you say 5 of what.

Every quantity in physics can be built from a small independent set. So you only need units for that set.

TermMeaningExamples
Base quantityIndependent, not built from otherslength, mass, time
Base unitThe unit of a base quantitymetre, kilogram, second
Derived unitCombination of base unitsm/s, kg·m/s², N, J
System of unitsThe complete set, base + derivedSI, CGS, FPS, MKS

Before SI

Three systems were in common use side by side:

SystemLengthMassTime
CGScentimetregramsecond
FPS (British)footpoundsecond
MKSmetrekilogramsecond

SISystème International d'Unités — replaced them internationally. It was last revised in November 2018 by the General Conference on Weights and Measures.


3. The Seven Base Units, and the 2018 Redefinition (Textbook 1.2)

This is the most quietly remarkable idea in the chapter.

Every SI base unit is now defined by declaring a constant of nature to be exact. No unit depends on a physical object any more.

Base quantityUnitSymbolFixed by declaring
Lengthmetremspeed of light c = 299792458 m/s
MasskilogramkgPlanck constant h = 6.62607015 × 10⁻³⁴ J s
Timesecondscaesium-133 frequency Δν = 9192631770 Hz
Electric currentampereAelementary charge e = 1.602176634 × 10⁻¹⁹ C
TemperaturekelvinKBoltzmann constant k = 1.380649 × 10⁻²³ J/K
Amount of substancemolemolAvogadro constant Nₐ = 6.02214076 × 10²³ /mol
Luminous intensitycandelacdluminous efficacy K_cd = 683 lm/W

You do not need to memorise these numbers. They are quoted only to show how precisely each constant is now known.

Why the kilogram changed

Until 2019 the kilogram was an actual metal cylinder — platinum-iridium, kept in a vault outside Paris.

That is a poor foundation. A physical object can pick up contamination or be damaged. If it drifts, every kilogram on Earth drifts with it.

The fix reverses the logic:

Old approachNew approach
Object defines the unitConstant defines the unit
Realising a kg = compare to the objectRealising a kg = an experiment
Only one master copy existsAny equipped lab can reproduce it

The metre now depends on the second

Light speed is fixed by definition. So once the caesium clock fixes the second, the metre follows automatically.

The metre is defined in terms of the second — not the other way round.

Two supplementary units

UnitForDefined asDimensions
radian (rad)plane anglearc ÷ radiusdimensionless
steradian (sr)solid anglearea ÷ radius²dimensionless

Both are ratios of like quantities, which is why neither has dimensions.


4. Significant Figures (Textbook 1.3)

What the term means

Every measurement carries uncertainty. The way you write a number should show how well you actually know it.

A significant figure count = all reliably known digits, plus the first uncertain one.

Example. A pendulum period written as 1.62 s:

DigitStatus
1certain
6certain
2first uncertain digit

That is three significant figures.

The counting rules

Start from one clean case. 2.308 cm has four significant figures. Now change units:

2.308 cm = 0.02308 m = 23.08 mm = 23080 μm

All four still have four significant figures. Changing units cannot make an instrument sharper.

RuleExampleCount
All non-zero digits count2.383
Zeros between non-zeros count6.0324
Leading zeros never count0.0023084
Trailing zeros with a decimal point count3.5004
Trailing zeros without a decimal point are ambiguous123003

The trailing-zero trap

Take a length reported as 4.700 m. Those zeros were written deliberately — otherwise the measurer would have written 4.7 m. So it has four significant figures.

Now convert it:

4.700 m = 470.0 cm = 4700 mm = 0.004700 km

Read 4700 mm on its own and the no-decimal rule gives you two figures. That is wrong. A unit change cannot alter measured precision.

The problem is that a plain integer with trailing zeros is genuinely ambiguous.

The fix: always use scientific notation

Write every measurement as a × 10ᵇ, with 1 ≤ a < 10.

FormSignificant figures
4.700 × 10² cm4
4.700 × 10³ mm4
4.700 × 10⁻³ km4

The power of ten carries no significance. Every digit in a is significant. No judgement calls remain.

Order of magnitude

Round a to 1 or 10, and the leftover 10ᵇ is the order of magnitude.

QuantityValueOrder
Earth's diameter1.28 × 10⁷ m10⁷
Hydrogen atom diameter1.06 × 10⁻¹⁰ m10⁻¹⁰

So Earth is 17 orders of magnitude larger than a hydrogen atom — one checkable sentence from two unwieldy numbers.

Exact numbers

Some numbers are exact by definition or by counting. They have unlimited significant figures and never limit a result.

Exact numberWhere it appears
the 2d = 2r
the 2πT = 2π√(l/g)
the ndividing by n readings when averaging

5. Arithmetic With Significant Figures (Textbook 1.3)

Two different rules

This is the most commonly confused pair in the chapter.

OperationWhat you countExample
Multiply / dividefewest significant figures5.74 ÷ 1.2 = 4.8
Add / subtractfewest decimal places436.32 + 227.2 = 663.8

Why they differ

  • Multiplication — each factor's fractional uncertainty carries into the product, so the weakest factor caps the result.
  • Addition — what matters is the last trustworthy decimal position. Adding 227.2 g cannot give you a trustworthy hundredths digit, because that input has none.

Worked case. 436.32 g + 227.2 g + 0.301 g = 663.821 g by raw arithmetic.

227.2 has only one decimal place → answer is 663.8 g.

Using the multiplication rule here would give 664 g, which misstates the precision in the other direction.

Subtraction loses figures

0.307 m − 0.304 m = 0.003 m

Both inputs had three significant figures. The answer has one. You cannot write 3.00 × 10⁻³ m — that invents two digits the measurement never had.

Example 1.1 — cube

A cube's side is measured as 7.203 m4 significant figures, so both answers round to 4.

QuantityRaw valueReported
Surface area 6a²311.299254 m²311.3 m²
Volume 373.714754 m³373.7 m³

Example 1.2 — density

5.74 g occupies 1.2 cm³.

InputSignificant figures
mass 5.74 g3
volume 1.2 cm³2 — limiting

5.74 ÷ 1.2 = 4.8666… → reported as 4.8 g/cm³.

The extra digits on your calculator are false precision, not extra accuracy.

Rounding when the dropped digit is exactly 5

The convention is round to the nearest even digit.

NumberRounds toWhy
2.7452.744 is already even
2.7352.743 is odd, bumps to even 4

Both land on 2.74, from opposite sides. That is deliberate, not coincidence.

Never round mid-calculation

Carry one extra digit through intermediate steps.

ApproachResult
Round 1/9.58 to 3 figures → 0.104, then invert9.62drifted
Keep 0.1044, then invert9.58correct

Round twice and the error compounds.


6. Uncertainty in a Calculated Result (Textbook 1.3.3)

This section is examinable. CBSE lists "Determining the uncertainty in result" under Unit I.

Writing a measurement with its uncertainty

A metre scale reading of 16.2 cm carries an uncertainty of one least division, ± 0.1 cm.

That can be written two ways — absolute, or as a percentage:

MeasurementAbsolute formPercentage form
length l16.2 ± 0.1 cm16.2 cm ± 0.6%
breadth b10.1 ± 0.1 cm10.1 cm ± 1%

The percentage form is what makes combining errors easy.

Combining errors in a product

Rule: for a product or quotient, the percentage errors add.

Worked, straight from the chapter:

StepWorking
Areal × b = 16.2 × 10.1 = 163.62 cm²
Percentage errors add0.6% + 1% = 1.6%
Convert back to absolute1.6% of 163.62 = 2.6 cm²
Raw result163.62 ± 2.6 cm²
Quoted result164 ± 3 cm²

The final rounding matters. An uncertainty of 2.6 is itself only known roughly, so it is quoted as 3, and the value is rounded to match — 164, not 163.62.

Relative error depends on the number, not just the digit count

Two masses measured on the same balance, both accurate to ± 0.01 g:

MeasurementRelative errorWorking
1.02 g± 1%0.01 / 1.02 × 100
9.89 g± 0.1%0.01 / 9.89 × 100

Same instrument, same absolute uncertainty — but ten times the relative error on the smaller mass. This is why weighing a small sample on a coarse balance is a bad idea.

Subtraction can destroy significant figures

12.9 g − 7.06 g, both given to three significant figures.

You cannot write 5.84 g. The correct answer is 5.8 g.

Addition and subtraction combine uncertainties by decimal places, not by significant figures — so a result can end up with fewer significant figures than either input started with.


7. Dimensions and Dimensional Analysis (Textbook 1.4 to 1.6)

What dimensions are

Every mechanical quantity reduces to a combination of [M], [L] and [T] raised to powers.

QuantityBuilt fromDimensional formula
Volumelength³[M⁰L³T⁰]
Speedlength ÷ time[M⁰LT⁻¹]
Accelerationlength ÷ time²[M⁰LT⁻²]
Forcemass × acceleration[MLT⁻²]
Energy / Workforce × length[ML²T⁻²]
Mass densitymass ÷ volume[ML⁻³T⁰]

Dimensions deliberately discard magnitude. Initial velocity, final velocity and average speed are physically different, but all are [LT⁻¹].

Formula vs equation

TermMeaningExample
Dimensional formulathe powers themselves[M⁰LT⁻¹]
Dimensional equationquantity equated to its formula[v] = [M⁰LT⁻¹]

The principle of homogeneity

Only quantities with the same dimensions can be added or subtracted.

Adding a velocity to a force is as meaningless as adding three apples to two hours. So every term on both sides of a correct equation must match dimensionally.

Test case: x = x₀ + v₀t + ½at²

TermDimensions
x[L]
x₀[L]
v₀t[LT⁻¹][T] = [L]
½at²[LT⁻²][T²] = [L]

All four match. The equation passes.

The test runs one way only

Failing it proves an equation wrong. Passing it never proves an equation right.

A bare numerical factor has no dimensions, so a dimensional check simply cannot see it.

Example 1.3 — checking an equation

Check ½mv² = mgh.

SideWorkingResult
Left[M][LT⁻¹]²[ML²T⁻²]
Right[M][LT⁻²][L][ML²T⁻²]

They match — dimensionally correct.

Example 1.4 — what dimensions can rule out

Five candidate formulas for kinetic energy. True dimension is [ML²T⁻²].

CandidateDimensionsVerdict
K = m²v³[M²L³T⁻³]eliminated
K = ½mv²[ML²T⁻²]survives
K = ma[MLT⁻²]eliminated — that is force
K = (3/16)mv²[ML²T⁻²]survives
K = ½mv² + mamixedeliminated — illegal sum

Two survive, and this is the point of the example.

½mv² and (3/16)mv² are dimensionally identical. The method cannot separate them, because it cannot see the numbers ½ and 3/16.

Only the derivation of kinetic energy from the work-energy theorem (Chapter 5) settles it. The answer is ½mv².

Example 1.5 — deriving a relationship

A pendulum's period T may depend on length l, bob mass m, and g.

Step 1. Assume a product form: T = k·lˣ·gʸ·mᶻ, with k dimensionless.

Step 2. Substitute dimensions:

[T¹] = [L]ˣ [LT⁻²]ʸ [M]ᶻ = L⁽ˣ⁺ʸ⁾ T⁻²ʸ Mᶻ

Step 3. Equate powers separately:

BaseEquationSolution
Mz = 0z = 0
Lx + y = 0x = ½
T−2y = 1y = −½

Step 4. Result: T = k√(l/g)

Two things fall out of this:

  • Mass drops out entirely (z = 0). A pendulum's period does not depend on the bob's weight — a real, testable physics result.
  • k cannot be found this way. The full Newtonian derivation gives k = 2π, so T = 2π√(l/g).

Always state that limitation. The derivation is incomplete without it — you have found the form of the relation, not the constant.

What the method can and cannot do

Good forCannot do
Sanity-checking a formula fastFind dimensionless constants (2π, ½)
Converting between unit systemsHandle sin, log, eˣ relationships
Finding the form of a relationSeparate torque from energy (both [ML²T⁻²])
Up to three independent variablesFour or more unknowns

8. What Exercises 1.6 and 1.8 Still Assume

These three exercises lean on the removed instrument material. Here is the minimum you need.

InstrumentLeast countTypical resolution
Vernier callipermain-scale division ÷ vernier divisions0.05–0.02 mm
Screw gaugepitch ÷ circular-scale divisions0.01 mm

Least count = the smallest change an instrument can actually resolve.

Worked: a screw gauge of pitch 1.0 mm with 100 circular divisions has least count 1.0 ÷ 100 = 0.01 mm.

More divisions do not mean unlimited precision

Past a point, extra markings outrun what the screw itself can resolve. Backlash — slack in the thread — becomes the real limit, not the dial.

Why more readings help

Any single reading carries random scatter in both directions.

Average enough readings and that scatter increasingly cancels. A mean of 100 readings sits closer to the true value than a mean of 5.

That is the whole reasoning behind Exercise 1.8(c).


9. Summary

  • A measurement is a comparison against a standard; a number without a unit means nothing.
  • Seven SI base units: metre, kilogram, second, ampere, kelvin, mole, candela.
  • Since 2018, every base unit is fixed by declaring a constant of nature exact.
  • The kilogram left its platinum-iridium cylinder behind; the metre now depends on the second.
  • Significant figures = reliable digits + the first uncertain one.
  • A change of units never changes the significant-figure count.
  • Scientific notation removes all trailing-zero ambiguity.
  • Multiply/divide → fewest significant figures. Add/subtract → fewest decimal places.
  • Round a dropped 5 to the nearest even digit; never round mid-calculation.
  • Dimensions are the powers of [M], [L], [T] that build a quantity.
  • Homogeneity: every term in a correct equation shares dimensions.
  • A dimensional check can disprove an equation, never prove one.
  • Dimensional analysis gives the form of a relation, never its dimensionless constant.
  • Still examinable: uncertainty in a result (Textbook 1.3.3) — relative error, and percentage errors adding for a product.
  • Not in this chapter: systematic/random error classification, and instruments as a taught topic.

Key formulas & results

Everything you need to memorise, in one card. Screenshot this for revision.

Significant figures
all reliable digits + the first uncertain one
1.62 s → 3 significant figures
Scientific notation
a × 10^b, with 1 ≤ a < 10
The only unambiguous way to write trailing zeros
Multiply or divide
keep the FEWEST significant figures
5.74 ÷ 1.2 = 4.8, not 4.87
Add or subtract
keep the FEWEST decimal places
A different rule — decimal places, not sig figs
Rounding a dropped 5
round to the EVEN neighbour
2.745 → 2.74 and 2.735 → 2.74
Measurement with uncertainty
l = 16.2 ± 0.1 cm = 16.2 cm ± 0.6%
section 1.3.3 — absolute and percentage form
Combining errors in a product
percentage errors ADD
0.6% + 1% = 1.6% → 164 ± 3 cm²
Relative error
(uncertainty ÷ value) × 100%
±0.01 g is ±1% on 1.02 g but ±0.1% on 9.89 g
Dimensional formulae
force [MLT⁻²] · energy [ML²T⁻²] · density [ML⁻³T⁰]
Torque is ALSO [ML²T⁻²] — dimensions can't separate them
Homogeneity
every term in a correct equation shares dimensions
Can disprove an equation, never prove one
⚠️

Common mistakes & fixes

These are the exact errors that cost students marks in board exams. Read them once, save yourself the trouble.

WATCH OUT
Believing uncertainty is off-syllabus for this chapter
It is examinable. CBSE 2026-27 Unit I lists 'Determining the uncertainty in result', and NCERT keeps it as section 1.3.3 inside significant figures.
WATCH OUT
Revising systematic vs random vs gross errors
That classification returns zero hits in the current chapter — it is older-edition material. Revise section 1.3.3 instead.
WATCH OUT
Treating 'dimensionally correct' as 'correct'
½mv² and (3/16)mv² pass identically; a dimensional check cannot see a bare number. Passing is necessary, never sufficient.
WATCH OUT
Thinking a unit change alters the significant-figure count
2.308 cm = 23.08 mm = 0.02308 m — four figures throughout. Converting units cannot sharpen an instrument.
WATCH OUT
Using the multiplication rule for an addition
Multiply/divide counts significant figures; add/subtract counts decimal places. 436.32 + 227.2 = 663.8 g, not 664 g.
WATCH OUT
Quoting an area as 163.62 ± 2.6 cm²
Round the uncertainty to one figure and match the value to it: 164 ± 3 cm². Carrying 163.62 implies precision the readings never had.
WATCH OUT
Rounding at every intermediate step
Round 1/9.58 to three figures then invert and you get 9.62, not 9.58. Carry one spare digit and round once at the end.
WATCH OUT
Expecting dimensional analysis to give the constant
It gives T = k√(l/g) and stops. k = 2π comes only from the full derivation — say so explicitly, or the derivation is incomplete.

NCERT exercises (with solutions)

Every NCERT exercise from this chapter — what it covers and how many questions to expect.

Practice problems

Work through this chapter's problems as a readiness check — reveal each solution, mark yourself honestly, and get your gap report at the end.

Readiness check

Are you exam-ready for Units and Measurements?

10 problems from this chapter. Try each one, reveal the worked solution, mark yourself honestly — get your gap report at the end.

10 questions~7 min worth ~23 marks in Telangana (TSBIE) exams

5-minute revision

The whole chapter, distilled. Read this the night before the exam.

  • A number without a unit means nothing.
  • Seven SI base units, each now fixed by a constant of nature.
  • The metre is defined via the second, not the reverse.
  • Significant figures = reliable digits + the first uncertain one.
  • Changing units never changes the significant-figure count.
  • ×÷ → fewest significant figures. +− → fewest decimal places.
  • Round a dropped 5 to the even neighbour.
  • Uncertainty is examinable, and lives in section 1.3.3.
  • For a product, percentage errors add.
  • Quote 164 ± 3 cm², not 163.62 ± 2.6 cm².
  • Homogeneity disproves an equation; it never proves one.
  • Dimensional analysis gives the form, never the constant.

Telangana (TSBIE) marks blueprint

Where the marks come from in this chapter — so you can plan your prep.

Typical chapter weightage: Unit I sits inside the 23-mark block covering Units I and II (CBSE Class 11 Physics, 70 marks)

Question typeMarks eachTypical countWhat it tests
SI units and significant figures1-21-2Naming an SI base unit or its defining constant; counting significant figures; applying the correct rule (multiply/divide vs add/subtract) to a calculation
Uncertainty and error combination2-31Writing a measurement with its absolute or percentage uncertainty; combining percentage errors in a product or quotient; rounding a result to match its uncertainty
Dimensional formulae and dimensional analysis3-51Writing dimensional formulae; checking homogeneity term by term; deriving the form of a relation and stating what the method cannot give
Prep strategy
  • Learn the chapter as three blocks: what a unit IS (1.1-1.2), how honestly to WRITE a number (1.3), and what dimensions can DO for you (1.4-1.6)
  • Memorise dimensional formulae of the common quantities — velocity, acceleration, force, energy, density — and be able to derive any other from its defining equation
  • Practise the pendulum-style derivation until the 'equate powers of M, L, T separately' step is automatic; it is the single most examined derivation here
  • Always state the limitation alongside a dimensional result: k cannot be found this way
  • Do not revise error propagation for this chapter — it is off-syllabus for 2026-27 and no marks are available for it
  • For every significant-figure question, first ask whether the operation is multiply/divide (count figures) or add/subtract (count decimal places) before touching the arithmetic

Where this shows up in the real world

This chapter isn't just an exam topic — it lives in the world around you.

Catching a wrong formula before it costs anything

A dimensional check takes fifteen seconds and rules out an inconsistent equation before it is ever used in a design, an experiment, or an exam answer.

The Mars Climate Orbiter

A 1999 NASA mission was lost because one team supplied thrust data in pound-force seconds while the software expected newton-seconds — a units mismatch, not a physics error.

Calibration laboratories worldwide

Because the base units are now pinned to constants of nature, any suitably equipped lab can realise a kilogram or a metre independently, without shipping an artefact to Paris.

Reporting a scientific result honestly

Significant figures are how a published measurement communicates the limits of the instrument that produced it, rather than the limits of the calculator that processed it.

Exam strategy

Battle-tested tips from teachers and toppers for this chapter.

1
Write the dimensional formula of every term explicitly before comparing them — the working is the answer, not the verdict
2
Check homogeneity term by term; show each term reduces to the same dimension
3
End every dimensional derivation by stating that the dimensionless constant cannot be found this way — without it the derivation is incomplete
4
Decide first whether the operation is multiply/divide (significant figures) or add/subtract (decimal places) before any arithmetic
5
Carry one extra digit through intermediate steps and round once at the end
6
Uncertainty is examinable — CBSE 2026-27 Unit I lists 'Determining the uncertainty in result'

Going beyond the textbook

For olympiad aspirants and curious learners — topics that build on this chapter.

STRETCH
Use the Buckingham Pi theorem to generalise the product-form method beyond three variables, and identify the dimensionless groups governing a given problem
STRETCH
Construct the Planck units — Planck length, mass and time — from c, h and G alone, and show that each is uniquely determined by dimensional reasoning
STRETCH
Show that the Reynolds number is dimensionless, and explain why that single fact allows a scale model in a wind tunnel to predict full-size behaviour
STRETCH
Given that the drag force on a sphere may depend on its radius, the fluid density and the flow speed, derive the form of the drag equation by dimensions and state exactly what remains undetermined
🚀

JEE Main & Advanced practice

Competitive-level problems on this chapter, above the board pattern. Try each one on paper before opening the solution.

JEE MainError propagation in kinetic energyFormula application

The mass and speed of a body are measured with percentage errors of 2% and 3% respectively. Find the maximum percentage error in the kinetic energy .

Stuck? Show the approach

For a product of powers, percentage errors multiply by the exponent and add. Here , so the error in counts once and the error in counts twice.

Show the full solution

Answer: 8%
The trap

A common slip is adding the errors as 2% + 3% = 5%, forgetting that v is squared in the formula — each power multiplies its variable's percentage error before the errors are summed.

JEE MainError in g from a pendulum experimentFormula application

In an experiment to find g using , the length l is measured with 1% error and the time period T with 2% error. Find the maximum percentage error in the computed value of g.

Stuck? Show the approach

Rearrange for g first: , so . The sign of the exponent does not matter for a maximum-error estimate — only its magnitude does.

Show the full solution

Answer: 5%
The trap

Students sometimes divide by 2 instead of multiplying by 2 for T, mistaking the square root in the original formula for T's own exponent — but once g is isolated, T appears as T^-2, not T^(1/2).

JEE MainDimensions of viscosity from Stokes' lawDimensional analysis

Stokes' law gives the viscous drag on a sphere as , where r is radius and v is speed. Find the dimensional formula of the coefficient of viscosity .

Stuck? Show the approach

Rearrange for the unknown and substitute the known dimensions of each remaining quantity: force, radius, and speed.

Show the full solution

Answer: [M L^-1 T^-1]
The trap

The numerical factor 6π is dimensionless and must be dropped before comparing dimensions — carrying it through as if it had units is a frequent error when rearranging a formula for an unknown constant.

JEE AdvancedCombined error in a four-variable derived quantityMulti-step error propagation

A quantity is calculated as , where a, b, c, d are measured with percentage errors of 1%, 2%, 3% and 4% respectively. Find the maximum percentage error in P.

Stuck? Show the approach

Treat P as a product of powers, including the negative power for d in the denominator and the fractional power (1/2) for the square root of c. Every exponent multiplies its variable's own percentage error, and a division still adds its error — it never subtracts.

Show the full solution

Answer: 13.5%
The trap

Because d sits in the denominator, some students subtract its error instead of adding it. Errors always add for both multiplication and division — a quantity in the denominator does not get its error sign flipped, since an error can push the true value either way regardless of where the variable sits in the formula.

JEE AdvancedDimensional derivation with an unreachable constantDerivation with conceptual trap

The fundamental frequency of a stretched string may depend on its length l, the tension T in it, and its mass per unit length . Use dimensional analysis to find how depends on l, T and , and explain why the method alone cannot fix the exact numerical relation used in practice, .

Stuck? Show the approach

Assume a product form with k dimensionless, substitute the dimensions of each quantity, and equate powers of M, L, T separately.

Show the full solution

, , , .

Equating M: . Equating T: , so . Equating L: .

Answer: nu = (k/l) sqrt(T/mu), with k a dimensionless constant the method cannot determine
The trap

Dimensional analysis correctly gives the l^-1 sqrt(T/mu) form but can never produce the factor of 1/2 in front, since that factor is a pure number with no dimensions to track — it comes only from the full wave-mechanics derivation (Chapter 14), not from this method.

Where else this chapter is tested

CBSE board isn't the only one — other exams test this chapter too.

CBSE Class 11 Physics examMedium
JEE Main and Advanced (Units & Dimensions)Medium
NEET PhysicsMedium
NSEP and Indian National Physics OlympiadMedium
KVPY-style aptitude and reasoning papersLow

Questions students ask

The real ones — pulled from the Q&A community and tutor sessions.

Partly removed, and the distinction matters for your marks. Uncertainty itself is very much in: NCERT keeps it as section 1.3.3, 'Rules for Determining the Uncertainty in the Results of Arithmetic Calculations', tucked inside the significant-figures section rather than standing alone. The CBSE 2026-27 syllabus for Unit I names it directly — 'significant figures, Determining the uncertainty in result'. So you must know the ± notation, relative error, and the rule that percentage errors add for a product. What genuinely has gone is the older edition's classification of errors into systematic, random and gross — a text search of the current chapter returns zero hits for any of those terms — along with the standalone sections on measuring instruments. So: revise 1.3.3 properly, and skip the systematic-versus-random tables your coaching notes may still carry.

Because it only ever checks that both sides of an equation balance dimensionally, and a bare number has no dimensions to balance. K = ½mv² and K = (3/16)mv² are dimensionally identical, so the method passes both equally and has no way to prefer one. It also cannot touch relationships built on sin, log or exponential functions, since those functions require dimensionless arguments before you even begin, and it cannot separate two quantities that happen to share a dimension — torque and energy are both [ML²T⁻²] despite being physically unrelated. What it gives you is the shape of a relation, which is often exactly what you need, plus a very fast way to rule wrong formulas out.

Until 2019 the kilogram was defined by an actual platinum-iridium cylinder stored outside Paris. That is an uncomfortable foundation for a system of units — a physical object can pick up contamination, or be damaged, and if it drifts then by definition every kilogram in the world drifts with it. The 2018 revision instead declares the Planck constant to be exactly 6.62607015 × 10⁻³⁴ J s, so a kilogram is now realised through experiment rather than compared against one irreplaceable object. For your calculations nothing changes — the new definitions were chosen precisely so that a kilogram stays the same size as before. What changes is that the standard is now reproducible in any suitably equipped lab, rather than existing in exactly one vault.

That is exactly the point — they must have the same count, because converting between units cannot make your instrument more or less precise. Both carry four significant figures (2, 3, 0, 8), and so do 0.02308 m and 23080 μm. The location of the decimal point is irrelevant to the count. The one form that causes trouble is a plain integer with trailing zeros, like 4700 mm, where you genuinely cannot tell from the digits whether those zeros were measured or are just placeholders. That ambiguity is the whole reason the book recommends writing every measurement in scientific notation, where the question never arises.

Because they are limited by different things. In a multiplication, the fractional uncertainty of each factor carries through to the product, so the factor known to the fewest significant figures caps the whole result. In an addition, what matters is the absolute position of the last trustworthy digit: adding 436.32 g to 227.2 g cannot give you a trustworthy hundredths digit, because one of the inputs simply does not have one — so the sum is capped at one decimal place, 663.8 g, regardless of how many significant figures each input had. Applying the multiplication rule here would give 664 g, which misrepresents the precision in the other direction.
Verified by the tuition.in editorial team
Last reviewed on 6 August 2026. Written and reviewed by subject-matter experts — read about our process.
Editorial process →
Header Logo