System of Particles and Rotational Motion
1. Check this before you revise anything
Two theorems that appear in almost every coaching handout for this chapter are not in the 2026-27 syllabus and not in the textbook.
| Topic | NCERT 2026-27 chapter | CBSE 2026-27 |
|---|---|---|
| Parallel axes theorem () | Absent — the phrase does not occur | Not listed |
| Perpendicular axes theorem () | Absent as a theorem | Not listed |
| Rolling motion dynamics | Mentioned once, only to illustrate combined motion | Not listed |
| Radius of gyration | Present | Listed |
| Values of moment of inertia for simple shapes | Given as a table | Listed — "no derivation" |
The NCERT exercises never use either theorem either, so nothing is orphaned. Do not spend revision time on them.
What CBSE does ask for is narrower than most notes suggest: centre of mass, torque, angular momentum and its conservation, equilibrium, rotational kinematics, the linear-rotational comparison, moment of inertia values (not derivations), and radius of gyration.
2. Why extended bodies need a new chapter
Every earlier chapter treated an object as a point. That works while you only care about where something goes, not how it turns.
Give a body size and two things break immediately:
- Where you apply a force now matters, not just how hard. Push a door at the handle or next to the hinge and you get very different results from the same force.
- The body can rotate, so a single position and velocity no longer describe it.
A rigid body — one whose particles keep fixed distances from each other — can do exactly two things: translate, rotate, or combine both. A cylinder rolling down an incline is that combination, which is the one place the chapter mentions rolling at all.
3. Centre of mass
For a system of particles, the centre of mass is the mass-weighted average position:
The point students miss: the centre of mass need not lie inside the body. For a ring it sits at the centre, in empty space. Example 6.3 works an L-shaped lamina where it again falls outside the material. Exercise 6.1 asks this directly.
Why it earns its own chapter section
The centre of mass moves as though the entire mass were concentrated there and all external forces acted on that single point:
Internal forces cancel in pairs, so they cannot shift it. That is why a projectile which explodes in mid-air has fragments whose centre of mass continues along the original parabola — the explosion is internal.
It also gives the momentum result CBSE lists explicitly: with no net external force, the total momentum of the system is constant, and the centre of mass moves with constant velocity. This is why a child running about on a frictionless trolley cannot change the trolley-plus-child centre of mass velocity, which is Exercise 6.3.
4. The vector product, and why it appears here
Chapter 5 introduced the scalar product for work. This chapter needs the other one, because torque and angular momentum are both cross products.
The direction comes from the right-hand rule, and order matters:
That sign is a common slip. The scalar product does not care about order; the vector product reverses.
5. Torque and angular momentum
Torque is the rotational analogue of force — the moment of a force about a point:
Only the component of the force perpendicular to turns anything. A force pointing straight at the axis produces no torque at all, however large.
Angular momentum of a particle is the moment of its momentum:
Differentiate it and the two connect, exactly as force connects to linear momentum:
The conservation trap
This is the error worth guarding against. Angular momentum is conserved when the net external torque is zero — not when the net external force is zero.
Those are different conditions. A force can be non-zero while its torque about your chosen axis is zero, because torque depends on where the force acts.
The standard illustration: a diver in mid-air. Gravity acts on her the whole time, so the net force is certainly not zero — but it acts through her centre of mass, so it exerts no torque about it. Her angular momentum is fixed. Folding into a tuck cuts her moment of inertia, so must rise to keep constant, and she spins faster. Opening out slows her again.
Since is constant, a smaller forces a larger . Nothing pushes her — the physics is bookkeeping.
6. Equilibrium of a rigid body
A rigid body needs both conditions, and checking only one is a reliable way to lose an answer.
| Condition | Meaning |
|---|---|
| No translational acceleration | |
| No angular acceleration |
A body can have zero net force and still spin up — a couple is precisely that case. Two equal and opposite forces along different lines give zero resultant force and a non-zero torque.
Example 6.7 shows that a couple's moment is the same about every point, which is why you can take moments about whichever point kills the most unknowns. That is the practical trick in Examples 6.8 and 6.9 — the bar on two knife-edges, and the ladder against a frictionless wall.
Worked: textbook example 6.8, choosing the point that kills the most unknowns
A 70 cm, 4.00 kg uniform bar rests on two knife-edges and , each 10 cm from an end. A 6.00 kg load hangs 30 cm from the end. Find the reaction at each knife-edge.
The bar's own weight acts at its centre , the midpoint (35 cm from either end), so cm and the load sits 5 cm from .
Translational equilibrium: N.
Rotational equilibrium, taken about — this single choice removes the unknown weight of the bar from the moment equation entirely, since it acts exactly at :
Solving the two equations together: N, N.
Taking moments about was the deliberate choice — about any other point, the bar's own weight would have contributed an extra term to the moment equation, needing an extra step to eliminate.
The principle of moments for a lever follows directly:
Centre of gravity is where the total gravitational torque vanishes. It coincides with the centre of mass when gravity is uniform over the body, which is every case in this chapter — but the two are defined differently and the chapter keeps them apart.
7. Moment of inertia
In rotation, mass is replaced by moment of inertia:
It is not a property of the body alone. Mass is fixed; moment of inertia depends on the axis you choose, because each particle contributes about that axis. Change the axis and the number changes.
The weighting is the whole story: a particle twice as far out counts four times as much. So mass far from the axis dominates.
Radius of gyration packages this as a single distance:
It is where you could put the entire mass, as a point, and get the same moment of inertia.
The values CBSE asks for — no derivation
| Body | Axis | |
|---|---|---|
| Thin ring, radius R | perpendicular to plane, at centre | |
| Thin ring, radius R | diameter | |
| Thin rod, length L | perpendicular to rod, at midpoint | |
| Disc, radius R | perpendicular to disc, at centre | |
| Disc, radius R | diameter | |
| Hollow cylinder, radius R | axis of cylinder | |
| Solid cylinder, radius R | axis of cylinder | |
| Solid sphere, radius R | diameter |
Read the ring against the disc. Same mass, same radius, and the ring has twice the moment of inertia — because all its mass sits at , while the disc's is spread across every radius from 0 to . That single comparison is what moment of inertia means.
8. Rotational dynamics, and the map back to linear motion
For a fixed axis, every linear equation has a rotational twin. The chapter's own comparison:
| Linear motion | Rotational motion about a fixed axis |
|---|---|
| Displacement | Angular displacement |
| Velocity | Angular velocity |
| Acceleration | Angular acceleration |
| Mass | Moment of inertia |
| Force | Torque |
| Work | Work |
| Kinetic energy | Kinetic energy |
| Power | Power |
| Linear momentum | Angular momentum |
Learn the table as a translation, not as nine new formulas. Every rotational result in this chapter is a linear one with mass swapped for and the linear quantity swapped for its angular partner.
The kinematic equations translate the same way, for constant :
Example 6.11 uses exactly these on a motor wheel going from 1200 to 3120 rpm, and Example 6.12 combines torque, angular acceleration and energy for a cord unwinding from a flywheel.
Worked: textbook example 6.11, converting rpm before touching a formula
A motor wheel's angular speed rises uniformly from 1200 rpm to 3120 rpm in 16 s. Find (i) the angular acceleration, and (ii) the number of revolutions turned in that time.
Convert both speeds to rad/s first — this is the step a rushed answer skips:
For the angle turned, use , then divide by to convert radians to revolutions:
The unit conversion is the entire difficulty here — every formula used is one already in the table above.
One caution carried over from Chapter 2: these hold only while angular acceleration is constant.
9. Summary
- Giving a body size breaks the point-particle picture: where a force acts now matters, and rotation needs its own description.
- Centre of mass need not lie inside the body, and moves as if all external force acted on it alone — internal forces cancel in pairs.
- Torque and angular momentum are both vector (cross) products, where order and direction matter.
- : angular momentum is conserved when net external torque is zero, not when net external force is zero.
- Rigid-body equilibrium needs both and — a couple satisfies the first while violating the second.
- Moment of inertia depends on the axis, not on the body alone, because of the weighting; radius of gyration packages it as one distance.
- A ring and a disc of equal mass and radius have different (MR² vs MR²/2) purely because of how that mass is distributed relative to the axis.
- Every linear quantity has a rotational partner — mass to , force to torque, momentum to — and the constant-acceleration kinematic equations translate directly.
- Parallel and perpendicular axes theorems, and rolling-motion dynamics, are not in the 2026-27 syllabus despite appearing in most coaching material.
