The Interview — Christopher Silvester
"Every famous person has a love-hate relationship with the interview. Mostly hate."
1. About the Chapter
'The Interview' has TWO PARTS: Part I, an essay by Christopher Silvester on the history and nature of the interview — why celebrities find them intrusive, and why journalists (and readers) find them indispensable. Part II is an EXTRACT from an interview with Umberto Eco (Italian novelist and semiotician, 1932–2016), conducted by Mukund Padmanabhan of The Hindu. Eco reveals his writing process, his philosophy of 'interstices' (using empty spaces of time), and the surprising secret behind the success of 'The Name of the Rose.'
2. Part I — The Interview as a Genre (Christopher Silvester)
What Is an Interview?
- The interview was 'INVENTED' over 130 years ago. It is now so ubiquitous that it's the 'commonplace of journalism.'
- 'Almost everybody who is literate will have read an interview.'
- The interview is a GENRE — with its own conventions, ethics, and controversies.
The Celebrity's View — 'Unwarranted Intrusion'
- Many famous people DETEST interviews:
- V.S. Naipaul: 'The interview is a form of aggression.'
- Rudyard Kipling: 'Today I am interviewed. Tomorrow I shall have no further wish to be interviewed.'
- H.G. Wells: found them tedious
- Saul Bellow: 'Interviews are like thumbprints on my windpipe.'
- The common complaint: interviews INVADE PRIVACY. They reduce complex people to SOUNDBITES. They MISREPRESENT.
The Journalist's / Reader's View — 'A Service to the Public'
- 'The interview is a supremely serviceable medium of communication.'
- Readers WANT to know about the lives and thoughts of famous people
- The interview is the most VIVID way to bring a personality ALIVE on the page
- 'The modern celebrity is a creature of the interview.'
The Interview's Dual Nature
- It is simultaneously: an INTRUSION (into the subject's privacy) and a SERVICE (to the public's curiosity)
- The best interviews: somewhere between interrogation and conversation
3. Part II — The Interview with Umberto Eco
Who Was Umberto Eco?
- Italian novelist, philosopher, and SEMIOTICIAN (the study of signs and symbols)
- Wrote the international bestseller 'The Name of the Rose' (1980) — a medieval detective novel that sold MILLIONS of copies
- A PROFESSOR before he was a novelist. His academic work on semiotics was highly respected.
- The question: how does a 50-year-old professor suddenly become a bestselling novelist?
Eco on Writing and Time — 'The Philosophy of Interstices'
- Interviewer's question: 'You have written five novels and many scholarly works. How do you manage to do so much?'
- Eco's answer: 'I use the EMPTY SPACES — the interstices.'
- Interstices = the gaps, the in-between moments. Waiting for an elevator. Travelling on a train. The minutes between appointments.
- 'I work in the empty spaces. While others are waiting, I am working.'
- This is NOT about being a WORKAHOLIC. It's about USING TIME that others WASTE.
Eco on 'The Name of the Rose' — The Secret of Its Success
- Interviewer: 'The Name of the Rose is a difficult novel. It's about medieval history, theology, and philosophy. Yet it became a MASSIVE bestseller. Why?'
- Eco's answer: 'I have NO idea. If I knew how to write a bestseller, I would write one every year.'
- He speculates: perhaps the timing was right. Perhaps readers were hungry for 'a novel that made them think.'
- 'It was written for a reader who wants to be challenged.'
Eco's Modesty and Humour
- Despite being one of the most famous intellectuals in the world, Eco is SELF-DEPRECATING
- He distinguishes between himself and his PUBLIC IMAGE: 'I am a university professor who writes novels on Sundays.'
- He does NOT take his fame seriously. He prefers to be seen as an ACADEMIC who happened to write a popular novel.
4. Themes
1. The Ethics of the Interview
Should we 'invade' a person's privacy to satisfy public curiosity? The essay presents BOTH sides — the celebrity's resentment AND the journalist's defence. It doesn't pick a winner. It lets the reader decide.
2. Time, Productivity, and 'Interstices'
Eco's philosophy of using 'empty spaces' is the most MEMORABLE part of the chapter. It's not about working HARDER — it's about not WASTING the moments between tasks. 'While others are waiting, I am working.'
3. The Mystery of Success
Eco's honest admission — 'I have no idea why it sold so many copies' — is REFRESHING. It challenges the myth that success can be PLANNED and REPLICATED. Sometimes, a book finds its audience for reasons the author can't explain.
4. The Public Image vs The Private Self
Eco distinguishes between 'Umberto Eco the famous novelist' (a media creation) and 'Umberto Eco the university professor who writes on Sundays' (the real person). The interview BOTH constructs and challenges this dual identity.
5. Key Lines
- "The interview is a supremely serviceable medium of communication."
- "I use the empty spaces — the interstices."
- "I am a university professor who writes novels on Sundays."
- "If I knew how to write a bestseller, I would write one every year."
6. Common Mistakes
- Eco's success was due to a 'formula' — He explicitly DENIES this. He doesn't know why it sold. He can't replicate it. The novel's success baffled him as much as anyone.
- 'Interstices' are the main topic of Part I — NO. Part I is about the INTERVIEW as a genre. Part II (the Eco interview) introduces interstices. The two parts are connected by the FORM (an interview) but cover different content.
7. Conclusion
'The Interview' is a TWO-PART CHAPTER:
- Part I: The interview as a JOURNALISTIC FORM — loved by readers, loathed by many celebrities. A debate about privacy, publicity, and the public's right to know.
- Part II: An INTERVIEW with Umberto Eco — who reveals his secret (the interstices), his bafflement at his own success, and the gap between his public and private selves.
'The Interview' — a chapter that is ITSELF an interview about interviews, followed by an interview that shows why interviews are worth reading.
