Chapter 7 of 20

35%

CBSE Class 11 Political Science★ 4-6 marks · CBSE Class 11 Political Science (Indian Constitution at Work) Chapter 7

Federalism (India)

India is a 'Union of States' — a federation with a strong centre. This chapter explains how power is divided between the Centre and States (the three lists), the ongoing tensions and negotiations, and the special provisions that make Indian federalism unique. CBSE Class 11 Political Science (Indian Constitution at Work) Chapter 7.

⏱ 24 min readMedium difficulty✓ Free · NCERT-aligned

Ask AI about this

🔤Build your vocabulary from this chapterLexiGenome mines the key words, explains them in your language, and schedules them with spaced repetition.Mine words →

By the end of this chapter you'll be able to…

1Identify the federal and unitary features of the Indian Constitution and explain why India is called 'quasi-federal'
2Describe the three legislative lists: Union List (97 subjects), State List (66 subjects), Concurrent List (47 subjects) — and what happens when Centre and State laws conflict on Concurrent List
3Explain administrative and financial relations between Centre and States
4Analyse the constitutional provisions that give Centre dominance: residuary powers, Article 356, Governor's role, Rajya Sabha Council of States
5Evaluate how Centre-State relations have evolved: from Congress dominance to coalition era to current dynamics

💡

Why this chapter matters

India is not a federation in the strict sense — it's a 'Union of States' with strong central tendencies. This tension between Centre and State, between national unity and regional diversity, is the defining structural feature of Indian politics. GST, farm laws, NEET, President's Rule, river water disputes — all are Centre-State conflicts rooted in the constitutional division of powers explained in this chapter.

Before you start — revise these

A 5-minute refresher here will save you 30 minutes of confusion below.

🔗

Executive

Governor's role and President's Rule connect federalism to executive

🔗

Legislature

Rajya Sabha as 'Council of States' is federal institution

Federalism — India

"India is a 'Union of States.' Not a 'Federation of States.' The word matters."

1. Chapter Overview

India is a FEDERAL system — power is constitutionally divided between the UNION and the STATES. But it's a federation with a STRONG CENTRAL TILT (quasi-federal). This chapter covers: the division of powers (Union, State, Concurrent Lists), Centre-State relations (legislative, administrative, financial), the special provisions for certain states, and the ongoing tensions in Indian federalism.

2. What Makes India a Federation?

Federal Features (from the Constitution)

Dual polity: Union government + State governments
Written Constitution: division of powers is clearly specified
Division of powers: Union List, State List, Concurrent List
Supremacy of the Constitution: Both Centre and States derive authority from the Constitution
Independent judiciary: Supreme Court resolves Centre-State disputes
Bicameral legislature: Rajya Sabha represents States

Unitary Features (Why India is 'Quasi-Federal')

'Union of States' (Article 1) — NOT 'Federation of States'
Strong Centre: RESIDUARY powers belong to the UNION (unlike USA — states)
Single Constitution: States don't have their own constitutions (except J&K — earlier)
Single Citizenship: Unlike USA (dual — federal + state)
Integrated judiciary: One judicial hierarchy (unlike USA — separate federal and state courts)
Parliament can alter state boundaries unilaterally (Art 3)
President's Rule (Art 356): Centre can dismiss a state government
All-India Services: IAS, IPS, IFS — officers serve both Centre and States

3. Division of Powers — The Three Lists

List	Subjects	Who Legislates
Union List (97 subjects)	Defence, foreign affairs, currency, railways, atomic energy, war, banking, insurance, inter-state trade	PARLIAMENT ONLY
State List (66 subjects)	Police, public health, agriculture, local govt, public order, liquor	STATE LEGISLATURE ONLY
Concurrent List (47 subjects)	Education, forests, marriage, adoption, trade unions, electricity, wildlife protection	BOTH. BUT: Centre's law PREVAILS in conflict.

Residuary Powers

Subjects NOT mentioned in any list
In INDIA: belong to the UNION (Parliament). In USA: belong to the States.

4. Centre-State Relations

Legislative Relations

Parliament can legislate on STATE subjects in certain circumstances:
1. When Rajya Sabha passes a resolution (2/3 majority) that a subject is of 'national interest'
2. During a National Emergency
3. To implement international treaties
4. When two or more states REQUEST Parliament to legislate

Administrative Relations

States must exercise executive power in compliance with Union laws
The Union can give DIRECTIONS to states
All-India Services (IAS, IPS) — recruited by Centre, serve in states

Financial Relations

States are DEPENDENT on the Centre for funds
Finance Commission (every 5 years, Art 280): recommends distribution of tax revenues between Centre and States
GST Council (101st Amendment, 2016): Centre and States jointly decide indirect taxes

5. The Changing Face of Indian Federalism

The Era of One-Party Dominance (1950s–1960s)

Congress ruled both Centre AND most States. Federal tensions were LOW (same party resolved issues internally).

The Era of Coalition Politics (1989 Onwards)

Rise of REGIONAL PARTIES. Coalitions at Centre.
States became MORE ASSERTIVE. The Centre HAD to negotiate.
Federalism became MORE GENUINE — the constitutional arrangement came to LIFE.

The Post-2014 Era

Return of single-party majority at Centre. New federal tensions:
- GST — cooperative federalism OR central overreach?
- Governor's role in opposition-ruled states
- Simultaneous elections debate
- Demand for greater financial autonomy

6. Special Provisions

Article 370 (Abrogated, August 2019)

Previously gave SPECIAL AUTONOMY to Jammu & Kashmir (own constitution, flag, limited Union jurisdiction). Abrogated. J&K reorganised into two UTs: J&K, Ladakh.

Fifth and Sixth Schedules

Fifth Schedule: Scheduled Areas — Tribal Advisory Councils, special protections for tribal land
Sixth Schedule: Autonomous District Councils in NE India (Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Tripura). Greater autonomy over land, forests, customary law.

Special Category States

NE states, Uttarakhand, HP — receive higher central grants due to hilly terrain, infrastructure deficit, etc.

7. Exam Focus

Federal features vs Unitary features — India as a 'quasi-federal' system
Three Lists — subjects, who legislates
Residuary powers belong to Union (India) vs States (USA)
How federalism changed: one-party era → coalition era → present
Finance Commission and GST Council (cooperative federalism)
Special provisions — Fifth & Sixth Schedules

8. Conclusion

Indian federalism is DYNAMIC — not static:

FEDERAL: Two levels of government, constitutionally divided powers, independent judicial arbitration
BUT UNITARY TILT: Strong Centre, residuary powers with Union, President's Rule
COALITION ERA transformed federalism: from paper to practice. States gained power.
ONGOING TENSIONS: The federal balance is constantly negotiated — through the Finance Commission, GST Council, and political pressures.

A federation is not a finished product. It is a continuing conversation between the Centre and the States. India's conversation is lively, loud, and ongoing.

Key formulas & results

Everything you need to memorise, in one card. Screenshot this for revision.

Three Legislative Lists (7th Schedule)

Union List: 97 subjects (defence, foreign affairs, atomic energy, railways, banking, currency) | State List: 66 subjects (police, public health, agriculture, local government, land) | Concurrent List: 47 subjects (education, forests, marriage, electricity, labour)

Conflict resolution: if Parliament and State legislature both make laws on a Concurrent List subject, PARLIAMENT'S LAW prevails (Art 254). Residuary powers (subjects not in any list) go to UNION (unlike USA where residuary goes to states).

Federal vs Unitary Features

Federal: Written constitution, Dual polity, Division of powers (3 Lists), Independent judiciary, Bicameral legislature | Unitary: Single citizenship, Residuary powers with Centre, Rajya Sabha NOT equal to Lok Sabha, Governor appointed by Centre, Article 356, Emergency provisions centralise power

Balance: India is federal IN STRUCTURE but unitary IN SPIRIT (Dr. Ambedkar). The centre of gravity is the Union Government, not the states.

Finance Commission (Art 280)

Constituted every 5 years by President | Recommends: how to divide central taxes between Centre and States (vertical devolution) + how to distribute states' share among states (horizontal devolution)

15th Finance Commission (2021–26): States' share of divisible pool = 41%. GST Council simultaneously determines state revenue from GST. Financial federalism is the most contested aspect of Centre-State relations.

Cooperative Federalism Mechanisms

Interstate Council (Art 263): disputes between states + Centre-State consultation | Inter-State Water Disputes Tribunal: river water allocation | GST Council: all states + Centre decide GST rates collectively | NITI Aayog: replaced Planning Commission; brings together CM + PM

GST Council is the best example of cooperative federalism — it requires consensus (or near-consensus) of all states and Centre to change tax rates. Any state can effectively veto GST changes.

⚠️

Common mistakes & fixes

These are the exact errors that cost students marks in board exams. Read them once, save yourself the trouble.

WATCH OUT

✗ Saying India is a federal state like the USA

✓ India is NOT a strict federation. Key differences from USA: (i) India has SINGLE citizenship; USA has dual (federal + state). (ii) Residuary powers in India go to CENTRE; in USA they go to states. (iii) India's Constitution can be amended to change state boundaries WITHOUT states' consent (Art 3). (iv) Governor is appointed BY CENTRE, not elected. India is more accurately 'quasi-federal' — federal in structure, unitary in spirit and crisis situations.

WATCH OUT

✗ Saying the Rajya Sabha is equal to the Lok Sabha in all matters

✓ Rajya Sabha is NOT equal to Lok Sabha in most matters. MONEY BILLS: Rajya Sabha can only suggest amendments (Lok Sabha can reject); Rajya Sabha has NO veto on Money Bills. ORDINARY BILLS: joint session (Art 108) resolves deadlock — and Lok Sabha's larger membership usually prevails. WHERE Rajya Sabha has special power: passing a resolution to enable Parliament to legislate on a State List subject (Art 249) — this protects state interests.

WATCH OUT

✗ Confusing the Inter-State Council with the National Development Council

✓ Inter-State Council (Art 263): resolves DISPUTES between states + recommendations on Centre-State issues. Chaired by PM; includes CMs and some Central ministers. National Development Council: previously an advisory body for Planning Commission (NITI Aayog has replaced this role). They have different functions and compositions.

WATCH OUT

✗ Saying all Centre-State financial transfers are via Finance Commission

✓ There are TWO channels for central transfers to states: (i) Finance Commission recommendations: TAX DEVOLUTION (41% of divisible pool) and grants — these are formula-based, non-discretionary. (ii) Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS): these are discretionary grants from Central ministries for specific programmes (PM-KISAN, PMAY, etc.). The tension between formula-based devolution and discretionary CSS is a major Centre-State conflict.

NCERT exercises (with solutions)

Every NCERT exercise from this chapter — what it covers and how many questions to expect.

Chapter Ex s

Chapter Exercises

Federal vs unitary features; three legislative lists; Governor's role; Centre-State relations; Finance Commission; cooperative vs competitive federalism; river water disputes

Questions

Practice problems

Try each one yourself before tapping "Show solution". Active recall > rereading.

Q1EASY· Legislative Lists

Classify each subject into the correct legislative list (Union, State, or Concurrent) and explain what would happen if both Parliament and a state legislature passed laws on a Concurrent List subject: (a) Defence and armed forces (b) Agriculture and irrigation (c) Labour relations and industrial disputes

▶ Show solution

(a) **Defence and armed forces → UNION LIST**: Security of the nation is entirely a Central function. No state can maintain its own army or conduct foreign policy. This reflects the 'unitary' character — centralised defence is essential for national security.

(b) **Agriculture and irrigation → STATE LIST**: Farming conditions, crop patterns, water use, and land relationships vary enormously across states. What works in Punjab's wheat farming doesn't apply to Kerala's spice cultivation. States understand their agrarian conditions better than the Centre. The 2020 Farm Laws controversy: Centre tried to legislate on 'agriculture' (State List subject) — states protested this was federalism violation.

(c) **Labour relations and industrial disputes → CONCURRENT LIST**: Labour issues cross state boundaries (migrant workers, interstate industries). But states have legitimate interests in regulating wages and working conditions. Both Parliament (labour codes — Code on Wages 2019, etc.) and state legislatures (state minimum wages) can legislate. **Conflict resolution**: If Parliament and a state legislature both pass laws on a Concurrent List subject and they conflict, PARLIAMENT'S LAW PREVAILS — unless the state law was reserved for the President's consideration and received his assent (Art 254 proviso).

Q2MEDIUM· Quasi-Federal Character

Why is India described as a 'Union of States' rather than a 'Federation of States'? Identify FOUR constitutional provisions that give the Centre dominance over states.

▶ Show solution

**Why 'Union' not 'Federation'**:
Dr. Ambedkar explained in the Constituent Assembly: 'The word Union is used because the federation is not the result of an agreement among the states. The state cannot secede from the Union.' Unlike USA (originally independent states that agreed to federate), India created states from scratch. The Union (Centre) has primacy by design — the states exist within the Union, they did not create it.

**Four constitutional provisions giving Centre dominance**:

1. **Residuary Powers (Art 248 + Entry 97 of Union List)**: Any subject not mentioned in any of the three Lists falls under PARLIAMENT'S legislative power. In contrast, USA constitution gives residuary powers to states. In India, any new technology (space, nuclear, internet) automatically falls to Parliament.

2. **Governor's Appointment by Centre (Art 155)**: The Governor of each state is appointed by the President (effectively the central Cabinet). The Governor can delay state legislation, reserve bills for Presidential assent, and recommend President's Rule — making this office a potential central agent in state politics. An elected governor (as in USA) would be more genuinely state-oriented.

3. **Article 356 (President's Rule)**: The Centre can directly govern a state if 'constitutional governance has broken down.' Though restricted by the Bommai case, this provision represents the Centre's ultimate veto over state governance.

4. **Emergency Provisions (Arts 352, 353, 360)**: During a National Emergency (Art 352), Parliament can legislate on ANY subject including State List subjects. States effectively become subject to Parliament's legislation in every domain — the federal structure is suspended. During the 1975–77 Emergency, the Central government controlled even police (State List) through Parliament's emergency legislation.

Q3HARD· Centre-State Financial Relations

Centre-State financial relations are a persistent source of tension in Indian federalism. Explain the constitutional framework for financial federalism. Why do states consistently claim they receive inadequate resources? What reforms would you suggest?

▶ Show solution

**Constitutional Framework**:

*Tax Division*:
- Taxes levied by Centre alone (custom duties, corporate tax, income tax) → constitutionally divided with states through Finance Commission recommendations
- Taxes levied by States alone (land revenue, stamp duty, state excise) → entirely state revenue
- GST (2017, 101st Amendment): replaced state sales tax + Central excise; Centre and states share 50-50 in IGST; CGST goes to Centre, SGST to states

*Finance Commission (Art 280)*:
- Constituted every 5 years; recommends VERTICAL devolution (Centre-to-states share) and HORIZONTAL distribution (how to divide among states)
- 15th Finance Commission (2021–26): 41% of divisible pool goes to states (down from 42% recommended by 14th FC — 1% transferred to newly created J&K UT)
- States receive about ₹8.25 lakh crore from tax devolution in 2023–24 through Finance Commission

*Grants-in-Aid (Art 275)*: Additional grants to less developed states to address fiscal capacity gaps

**Why states claim inadequacy**:

1. **Centralisation of revenue**: GST centralises tax administration — states gave up their independent sales tax and VAT for a shared system. The 'input tax credit' mechanism and IGST administration are Central-controlled, delaying state revenue flows.

2. **CSS proliferation**: Over 200 Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS) come with 'conditions' — states must contribute matching funds (typically 40–60% share) AND spend on Central priorities. This reduces state fiscal autonomy.

3. **Revenue buoyancy gap**: States bear disproportionate spending responsibilities (health, education, police = State List) but revenue sources haven't grown as fast as expenditure needs. COVID-19 health expenditure fell on states; Centre's direct fiscal transfers were inadequate.

4. **Natural resource revenue centralisation**: Taxes on coal, oil, and minerals go primarily to the Centre, even when states bear all environmental and social costs (mining displacement, pollution).

5. **GST compensation cess controversy**: States were promised 14% annual revenue growth guarantee when GST was introduced. During COVID-19, the Centre stopped compensation payments (arguing revenues were insufficient) — creating a major trust deficit.

**Suggested reforms**:
(i) **Increase Finance Commission devolution to 45%+**: Higher formula-based transfers reduce discretionary power and state dependency.
(ii) **Rationalise CSS**: Reduce from 200+ to 50 core schemes; give states flexibility in implementation rather than prescribing Central processes.
(iii) **Greater GST autonomy for states**: Allow states to vary GST rates within bands for some items, restoring some tax flexibility.
(iv) **Permanent Finance Commission**: Replace ad hoc 5-year commissions with a permanent body that can respond to crises in real time (as happened during COVID).
(v) **Urban local body funding**: Create a constitutional revenue-sharing mechanism for urban local bodies (currently dependent on state discretion), enabling smart city investments.

5-minute revision

The whole chapter, distilled. Read this the night before the exam.

•Federal features: written constitution, dual polity (Centre + states), 3 Lists, independent judiciary, bicameral Parliament (Rajya Sabha = Council of States)
•Unitary/centralising features: single citizenship, residuary with Centre, Governor by Centre, Art 356, emergency centralises all power, Parliament can make state laws in national interest (Art 249)
•Three Lists: Union (97 subjects — defence, foreign affairs, banking, railways), State (66 — police, agriculture, land, health), Concurrent (47 — education, forests, labour). Conflict: Parliament prevails on Concurrent List
•Finance Commission: Art 280, every 5 years, recommends tax devolution (41% to states, 15th FC) + grants. GST Council: Centre + all states decide rates (cooperative federalism)
•S.R. Bommai 1994: restricted Art 356 misuse. Before: President's Rule used ~100 times. After: judicial review, parliamentary approval mandatory, floor test required
•Why 'Union not Federation': states not parties to the agreement; India created states (not vice versa); states cannot secede; Centre has residuary powers

CBSE marks blueprint

Where the marks come from in this chapter — so you can plan your prep.

Typical chapter weightage: 4-6 marks

Question type	Marks each	Typical count	What it tests
Short Answer (SA-II)	4	1	Distinguish federal vs unitary features; classify subjects into three lists; explain residuary powers; describe Finance Commission's role
Long Answer (LA)	6	1	Evaluate India's 'quasi-federal' character; analyse Centre-State financial relations; explain why India is Union not Federation; cooperative vs competitive federalism

Prep strategy

Three legislative lists: MEMORISE 3-4 examples for EACH list. Union: defence, foreign affairs, banking, railways, atomic energy. State: police, agriculture, land, local government, public health. Concurrent: education, forests, marriage, electricity, labour. Examiners give subjects and ask you to classify — have examples ready.
Federal vs unitary features question: use a 2-column table (Federal features on left, Unitary/centralising features on right). Federal: 3 lists, written constitution, dual polity. Unitary: single citizenship, residuary to Centre, Governor by Centre, Art 356. Memorise 4 from each column.
Finance Commission: Article 280, every 5 years, two roles — vertical devolution (41% to states) + horizontal distribution (how divided among states). Always connect to a current 5th FC number to show you know current data.

Where this shows up in the real world

This chapter isn't just an exam topic — it lives in the world around you.

GST and Cooperative Federalism

The GST Council (formed by 101st Amendment, 2016) is India's most successful cooperative federalism institution. All 28 states + 8 UTs + Centre jointly decide GST rates. Every GST rate change requires consensus — any state can block changes. During COVID-19, states demanded compensation from Centre under the GST guarantee — the dispute went to Supreme Court. This real-time federal negotiation over money is exactly what this chapter's theory describes.

NEET and State Autonomy

Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, and other states have repeatedly challenged NEET (National Eligibility cum Entrance Test for medical admissions). Their argument: 'Education' is on the Concurrent List — states should have the right to set their own medical entrance criteria. Centre argues NEET ensures uniform quality. Tamil Nadu passed a law exempting itself from NEET (2021), which was reserved for Presidential assent (Art 254 proviso route) — directly applying this chapter's Concurrent List conflict resolution mechanism.

Exam strategy

Battle-tested tips from teachers and toppers for this chapter.

For 'why quasi-federal?' questions: define genuine federation first (USA model: strong states, residuary with states), then show how India deviates on 3-4 specific points. The word 'quasi' means 'partly' — India is partly federal (3 lists, written constitution) but also partly unitary (Centre dominance). Never say India is fully federal or fully unitary.
For the 3-lists question: examiners give 6-8 subjects and ask classification. Practise with these: Stamp duty → State; Income tax → Union (collected, but shared); Marriage and divorce → Concurrent; Police → State; Currency → Union; Education → Concurrent (post-42nd Amendment). These exact subjects appear in exams.
Finance Commission: 2-mark question almost guaranteed. Memorise: Article 280, constituted every 5 years, recommends (1) vertical devolution % and (2) horizontal distribution formula. 15th Finance Commission (2021–26) gave states 41%.

Going beyond the textbook

For olympiad aspirants and curious learners — topics that build on this chapter.

Study fiscal federalism in India's COVID-19 response: states bore health expenditure (State List) but revenue collapsed; Centre collected more (GST, income tax). Analyse whether India's fiscal federalism is structurally equipped for crisis. Compare with Germany's federal crisis response (joint federal-state funding under Schuldenbremse suspension)
Research the demand for 'Special Category States' status — why do northeastern states, Himachal Pradesh, and Uttarakhand demand this classification, and what financial benefits does it provide (90:10 Centre:State funding ratio vs 60:40 for other states)? Is this 'asymmetric federalism' fair?

Where else this chapter is tested

CBSE board isn't the only one — other exams test this chapter too.

CBSE Class 11 BoardHigh

CUET Political ScienceHigh

UPSC Prelims + Mains (GS-2: Polity)Very High

AI helpers for this chapter

Generate more practice on the fly, or have the chapter explained at a different level.

⚡

Generate 5 more questions

Fresh MCQs + short-answer items based on this chapter, plus answer keys.

🧠

Explain at a different level

Re-explain the chapter at the level you actually want.

📝 My notes

Saved on this device — sign in to sync · how this works

0/600

Questions students ask

The real ones — pulled from the Q&A community and tutor sessions.

Under Article 254: if there is inconsistency between a State law and a Parliamentary law on a Concurrent List subject, the PARLIAMENTARY LAW PREVAILS to the extent of the inconsistency. The State law becomes void to that extent. EXCEPTION: If the State law was passed AFTER the Parliamentary law AND was reserved for the President's consideration AND received the President's assent, the State law can prevail in that state (even over the Parliamentary law). This exception allows states to 'override' Central legislation on Concurrent List subjects in specific circumstances — but only with Presidential approval.

Cooperative federalism: Centre and states work TOGETHER on shared goals — GST Council (consensus decisions on tax rates), Joint implementation of Centrally Sponsored Schemes, NITI Aayog replacing Planning Commission (CMs participate in planning). Competitive federalism: states COMPETE for investment, skilled workers, tourism — 'Ease of Doing Business' rankings, investment summits. Modi government emphasised both: 'Team India' (cooperative) + 'investor race' (competitive). Cooperative is more suited for public services; competitive for economic development. Both are needed.

Practice more, ask doubts, find a tutor

CBSE Class 11 mock tests

CBSE Class 11 PYQs

Ask in Q&A

Political Science flashcards

Related chapters

Students who read Federalism (India) usually read these next.

Constitution — Why and How?

Every country has a constitution — but WHY? This chapter answers: a constitution provides the basic rules for how a country is governed, limits government power, and protects citizens' rights. It traces how India's Constitution was MADE — the Constituent Assembly, the borrowing from other constitutions, and the commitment to justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity. CBSE Class 11 Political Science (Indian Constitution at Work) Chapter 1.

Rights in the Indian Constitution (Fundamental Rights)

The Constitution doesn't just create government — it PROTECTS citizens from government. This chapter covers the 6 Fundamental Rights (Part III), the difference between rights and Directive Principles, and the remedy when rights are violated: writs and the Supreme Court. CBSE Class 11 Political Science (Indian Constitution at Work) Chapter 2.

Election and Representation

Democracy means rule by the people — but HOW do the people choose their representatives? This chapter covers India's electoral system: First-Past-The-Post, universal adult franchise, the Election Commission, and electoral reforms. CBSE Class 11 Political Science (Indian Constitution at Work) Chapter 3.

Executive

Who actually RUNS the country? The Executive — from the President (nominal head) to the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers (real executive). This chapter explains India's parliamentary executive, the distinction between nominal and real executive power, and the bureaucracy that implements decisions. CBSE Class 11 Political Science (Indian Constitution at Work) Chapter 4.