A ball rolling on flat ground stops on its own after some time, and a bicycle slows down when you stop pedalling. The chapter says that in these situations 'no force appears to be acting'. Explain how it nevertheless concludes that a force must be at work.
Hint. Use the rule from section 5.2 in reverse.
The reasoning, step by step.
- The ball's speed changes — it slows down and stops.
- From section 5.2: a force is essential to change the speed of an object, and none of these changes take place without the action of a force.
- Therefore a force must be acting on the ball, even though nothing visible is pushing or pulling it.
- So the chapter asks the right question — not is there a force, but which force is it: Is it possible that some force is indeed acting on them? Which force is that?
✦ This is the chapter's method at its clearest. The force is not discovered by seeing it. It is deduced from an effect that could not have happened without it, and only then is it looked for and named. Friction is invisible, which is precisely why it took an argument rather than an observation to establish.
The clue in the everyday observation. If the road is rough, it stops sooner than on a smoother road. Whatever this force is, it depends on the surface — which already hints that it acts between the ball and the ground, and Activities 5.3 and 5.4 go on to confirm it.
The same rolling ball appears again in exercise question 1 as the example matched to frictional force, and in exercise question 2(ii).
