Why does the chapter say that at least two objects must interact for a force to come into play? Test the idea against the rows of Table 5.1.
Hint. For each row, count the objects. Can you find one with only a single object in it?
The argument. When you push a table, your hand is one object applying force on another object — the table. Look through Table 5.1 and every row has two objects in it:
| Action | Object 1 | Object 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Friend holding your moving bicycle to stop it | Friend's hands | Bicycle |
| Hitting a moving ball with a bat | Bat | Ball |
| Pressing an inflated balloon | Hand | Balloon |
| Opening a drawer | Hand | Drawer |
| A fruit falling from a tree | The Earth | The fruit |
Do you notice that forces result only when two objects are interacting in some way or the other? From these examples, we can infer that at least two objects must interact for a force to come into play.
✦ The last row is the one that tests the rule properly. Nothing is touching the falling fruit, so it is tempting to say only one object is involved. But the pull comes from the Earth, so there are still two objects — they simply are not in contact. The rule survives, and that is what makes section 5.4.2 on non-contact forces possible.
A test you can apply to any force question: name the two objects. If you cannot name both, you have not identified the force properly. 'The ball has a force' is not an answer; 'the Earth pulls the ball' is.
